Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:26:17 -0600
From: Special Ed
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.nospam.christinamodel
Subject: Re: - "s834-094_sam.jpg" Another Pregger Fake for the slow times
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:26:15 -0500
Message-ID: <o1jpeap03bhsuf4c6kht5ft6j0pqk7ecc0@4ax.com>
References: <090120152141525321%samurai@pagoda.org> <RPCdna7FocEceynJnZ2dnUU7-amdnZ2d@giganews.com> <k2nddahaiejsq4qav0avj4q265i69fqp6f@4ax.com> <XnsA43EB6F0F9B2Bnamcardcom@69.16.179.23>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186 trialware
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 56
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-IKPdLY1JKFAREP6gbk8wb9x8PYhBoq2Dsx5emRlDqvKlU0BZwmIR9EeCic1IRAuKkLHt6hg/OVW8fv+!AcmBGO6ceST3/vEhPmJN23HxNlmdZyec/JvNo2BO8i+MY/3zXCP2kzfWOolEtV9tc1W9tMs=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3976
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2696088757
X-Received-Bytes: 4269
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.nospam.christinamodel:478
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:58:56 GMT, Frank Dracman <oblivion@thetet.net>
wrote:
>Special_Ed@no.com wrote in
>news:k2nddahaiejsq4qav0avj4q265i69fqp6f@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:33:59 GMT, dirtyold@bastard.com wrote:
>>
>>>Should not be any need for these, if she valued her clients she would
>>>have posted real ones.
>>>
>>>Also really bad business not to do so.
>>
>> I have never known a woman who thinks she is hot when she is very
>> pregnant. In fact, most guys do not think they do either (I happen to
>> think they do, apparently you do, true, but we are not the majority in
>> the world), and if that weren't the case, if most men thought preggos
>> were hot, women wouldn't think they look bad pregnant. Therefore,
>> given that our appreciation of that look is somewhat of a "niche", I
>> don't think she can be blamed for not wanting to make those pictures
>> and I don't think it is proof of lack of value of her clients any more
>> than your demand for said pics is a lack of valuing her and her
>> wishes.
>>
>> sEd
>>
>
>With all due respect, if you are a Christina fan from the beginning, there
>is no way you WOULDN'T want to see her pregnant and nude! Think about those
>patrons, some of who have posted their fantasy photos of her in that exact
>state. IMO, it's a more than valid argument.
And likewise with all due respect, pregnancy is something private
between a woman and a man, don't you think? Something that goes beyond
a models participation in porn. Porn is just another job. A woman
isn't obligated to post pics of herself at the water cooler simply
because she has had the priovilege of working at a particular
company.Yes, quite a few long time fans might want to see the belly
etc., if not for the hotness of it, at least as sort of an "ending" to
the whole phenomenon of watching her grow and age. But again, if she
submitted to their whims, the majority of men out there are not
interested. If she were to get into porn later, it would be better
commercially if she could pretend to never have been preggo. For
instance, I've never seen Ann-Marie pregnancy pics, though I see the
stretch marks indicating she had one or more. True Trinity Loren, one
of my all time favorites, did extensive pregnant and lactating shoots,
but she died shortly there after so my theory was never tested with
her career. Had she continued she might have been typecast as that
pregnant/lactating one (ulimately it's the same mindset as regular
female actresses never revealing their age). That might be good in a
way because maybe it will mean that LTFs get to see her doing hardcore
and when that peters out, the lactating/pregnancy shots. Follow her
all the way, in other words...
sEd
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|