On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:32:39 -0400, LAKing@NHAx.net wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:14:22 -0400, Damon wrote:
>
>
>>
>>I was there. I posted her real name and address and the names
>>of the two strip joints that she worked at during that time. Anyone
>>with a brain could have checked with those places I posted and seen
>>for themselves that I was correct. I wasn't just there to see her.
>>That would make me a stalker. I was there to see a concert of a band
>>that almost never comes to America. Before and after the show I went
>>to the places and a few dollars loosened the lips of the tattooed
>>skanks that "worked" with her.
>>
>>
>>Sure others have come forward, but consider this, if they have a news
>>reader that shows their server and where they are from, why would they
>>risk it? They are already doing something off color simply by being
>>here. They have a good reason to keep themselves anonymous. Do you
>>think "spermy" is a real name? These guys might be married and don't
>>want the wife to see what they are doing here.
>>
>>
>>The report I gave is a fact and if you were paying attention you would
>>have seen that it had in fact been verified, but a asshole like you
>>would say that isn't proof either. Then yet another would verify my
>>claims and then once more you would say he too does not count. You
>>refuse to accept reality and that is on you, not me. Everything we
>>know about her comes from me and me alone. I did not always go by
>>Damon.
>>
>>Pay attention or fuck off.
>>
>
>well, my reply was to Rebar, but thanks for alerting me that that's
>not his real name. I am so embarrassed.
>
>So you posted her name and the names of strip joints? Sorry, that
>proves nothing.
>
>i'm not saying it's not possible that she worked as a stripper, it's
>just that "rebar's" response wasn't convincing to me. As I said, why
>are you the only one with this claim? If one or two more backed it up
>then it'd be more believable. I don't believe that anyone else has not
>come forward because he's worried that posting on usenet would
>implicate him. How would he explain his time at the "joint"? Business
>trip?
>
>If this verification is still in usenet, please post it again. If I'm
>wrong then I'll admit it.
Look it up. These usenet posts are stored for several years. The
retention on my end goes back to 2008. I am not doing your homework
for you, simply because I don't care enough to dig through my files to
prove something I have already proven in the past to some dipshit on a
newsgroup.
You can believe that, jackass.
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|