On 2014-09-14 15:32:39 -0500, LAKing@NHAx.net said:
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:14:22 -0400, Damon wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I was there. I posted her real name and address and the names
>> of the two strip joints that she worked at during that time. Anyone
>> with a brain could have checked with those places I posted and seen
>> for themselves that I was correct. I wasn't just there to see her.
>> That would make me a stalker. I was there to see a concert of a band
>> that almost never comes to America. Before and after the show I went
>> to the places and a few dollars loosened the lips of the tattooed
>> skanks that "worked" with her.
>>
>>
>> Sure others have come forward, but consider this, if they have a news
>> reader that shows their server and where they are from, why would they
>> risk it? They are already doing something off color simply by being
>> here. They have a good reason to keep themselves anonymous. Do you
>> think "spermy" is a real name? These guys might be married and don't
>> want the wife to see what they are doing here.
>>
>>
>> The report I gave is a fact and if you were paying attention you would
>> have seen that it had in fact been verified, but a asshole like you
>> would say that isn't proof either. Then yet another would verify my
>> claims and then once more you would say he too does not count. You
>> refuse to accept reality and that is on you, not me. Everything we
>> know about her comes from me and me alone. I did not always go by
>> Damon.
>>
>> Pay attention or fuck off.
>>
>
> well, my reply was to Rebar, but thanks for alerting me that that's
> not his real name. I am so embarrassed.
>
> So you posted her name and the names of strip joints? Sorry, that
> proves nothing.
>
> i'm not saying it's not possible that she worked as a stripper, it's
> just that "rebar's" response wasn't convincing to me. As I said, why
> are you the only one with this claim? If one or two more backed it up
> then it'd be more believable. I don't believe that anyone else has not
> come forward because he's worried that posting on usenet would
> implicate him. How would he explain his time at the "joint"? Business
> trip?
>
> If this verification is still in usenet, please post it again. If I'm
> wrong then I'll admit it.
About 4-5 years ago Christina put out there a number of times that she
was a hostess at a pizza restaurant. She actually had people in this
group feeling sorry for her that the nude web site business wasn't
cutting it financially and she had to be a hostess to make ends meet.
Fast forward to this past August, her webmaster publicly posts on her
web site that he has sent her about 2.5 million dollars over the past
decade. It's doubtful that she was ever a pizza restaurant hostess when
she's making around $200,000+ a year. I have come to believe that in
Christina's world nothing ever is as it seems.
There are people who have always had their fantasies about Christina,
which is why so many in here have long for her early internet days when
she was young and had a super voluptuous hotness mixed with an
innocence (which is a potent combo). She enviably got older and changed
and dudes were pissed off (as if father time isn't coming for them
also). Their fantasy of her was shattered.
I think Christina really did start off fairly innocent and maybe a bit
naive. I'm positive that changed years ago. I'm sure she stripped. All
the signs were there- the improved dancing ability, the cheesy body
studs she stuck into herself, the hair, which was always long, all of a
sudden got that long layered stripper cut thing going on. All just
circumstantial evidence? Certianly... but added all togther it makes
more sense than she bought herself a home stripper pole and
instructional video kit.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|