On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:14:22 -0400, Damon wrote:
>
>I was there. I posted her real name and address and the names
>of the two strip joints that she worked at during that time. Anyone
>with a brain could have checked with those places I posted and seen
>for themselves that I was correct. I wasn't just there to see her.
>That would make me a stalker. I was there to see a concert of a band
>that almost never comes to America. Before and after the show I went
>to the places and a few dollars loosened the lips of the tattooed
>skanks that "worked" with her.
>
>
>Sure others have come forward, but consider this, if they have a news
>reader that shows their server and where they are from, why would they
>risk it? They are already doing something off color simply by being
>here. They have a good reason to keep themselves anonymous. Do you
>think "spermy" is a real name? These guys might be married and don't
>want the wife to see what they are doing here.
>
>
>The report I gave is a fact and if you were paying attention you would
>have seen that it had in fact been verified, but a asshole like you
>would say that isn't proof either. Then yet another would verify my
>claims and then once more you would say he too does not count. You
>refuse to accept reality and that is on you, not me. Everything we
>know about her comes from me and me alone. I did not always go by
>Damon.
>
>Pay attention or fuck off.
>
well, my reply was to Rebar, but thanks for alerting me that that's
not his real name. I am so embarrassed.
So you posted her name and the names of strip joints? Sorry, that
proves nothing.
i'm not saying it's not possible that she worked as a stripper, it's
just that "rebar's" response wasn't convincing to me. As I said, why
are you the only one with this claim? If one or two more backed it up
then it'd be more believable. I don't believe that anyone else has not
come forward because he's worried that posting on usenet would
implicate him. How would he explain his time at the "joint"? Business
trip?
If this verification is still in usenet, please post it again. If I'm
wrong then I'll admit it.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|