Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:17:02 -0500
From: rebar <rebar@rbar.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.nospam.christinamodel
Subject: Re: Twitter convo - "twitter convo.jpg" yEnc
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 18:16:56 -0400
Message-ID: <7r2ur91m06ndllrvrbfvtq0rdqg6a3ahc5@4ax.com>
References: <2014071011444371680-nohow@nowaynett> <2014071011482579007-nohow@nowaynett> <a9ttr9h7s4c63vc8m8rtsq30p3lfaq3eel@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 53
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-MTfOsobEmUAYPab+3Njq7icNfVcoeWx1y55ogar3zOEpoj4uyauLB+L+PCmWBL0wIav6euzkF0bjw28!Ct0Q6cRtCgSukWCk9FT26bJs8EvepF55o21nQDu8ohuqxQX3vEoadK3SkMomh5hjIpW2U2aM
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3306
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2486778048
X-Received-Bytes: 3559
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.nospam.christinamodel:179
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:20:06 -0500, Flatlander <flatlander47@cox.net>
wrote:
>>
>>He has come up with an action plan and is doing the math for her.
>
>Yeah...because math is hard.
>
For Christina it probably is.
>Makes you wonder what kind of arrangement she has with the guy who
>runs the site, since she doesn't seem to have much control over it. On
>the other hand, if she were making the decisions, who knows what kind
>of crap we'd be getting.
It seems like the webmaster just doesn't care anymore. It really is
time for her to get someone new.
I've worked as a webmaster before, and when you work with dingbats, it
DOES get frustrating. They send a bunch of half-assed material at the
last minute that you're supposed to Jenga into something presentable,
then they bitch if things aren't exactly right.
This is just speculation, but maybe she keeps dropping the ball on her
end too (not getting content on time or not sending the type of
content he says they need, who knows?), and he's just fed up and tired
of tying up the loose ends for her; saying, "if she doesn't care
enough to get things right, why should I?"
We've seen the crappy lighting quality of some of her videos and
photoshoots. He probably gets those, then sees the spelling errors and
says, "THIS is what you want to put your name on? If this is the
quality you want representing you, then I'm not going to worry about
the finer details either. I'm tired of trying to polish a turd."
Like you said, if she were making the decisions, who knows what kind
of crap we'd be getting.
My guess is that the lame spelling and grammar that's actually on the
site, like the excuses for no content back in April, was actually
written by her, then sent to him to post. He saw the 3rd grade level
of language skills, and said, "you know what? I'm going to put this up
exactly as it is. I'm not wasting any more time than I have to on this
bimbo.
It's a very unprofessional attitude for him to take, and if that's the
case, then he's as bad as she is, and shouldn't be in the business.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.nospam.christinamodel/179h', 'Re: Twitter convo - "twitter convo.jpg" yEnc')){kind=link}