On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:49:57 GMT, KB7 <anyone@anywhere.com> wrote:
>boing <boing@boing.net> wrote in
>news:fj4ulbtrp4lad4uca9rd20ghisgek1c3te@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:08:52 GMT, KB7 <anyone@anywhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>>If anyone likes her, I have some more sets.
>>
>> I like her :D
>
>Ok, I've posted a couple of sets.
>
>As a poster yourself, is there a charter for this group?
>
>As long as the the breasts are natural, do they have to be large?
>
>I'm not talking flat chested but I've noticed that most of the posts
>feature large breasts e.g. Milena.
>
>Most of my sets are high-def stuff, but don't always have 'big' gals.
I have been mostly loitering around here, but have been for more years
than I care to admit. In that time, I haven't seen a charter or FAQ
posted, and can't recall any meaningful discussion about what is on or
off-topic.
I picked up on the posting of Milena, as previous posters had dropped
off. I post them here, as this is where I had been DL'ing them from.
You are right - it does tend to be a large breast board, but I have
always wondered the same thing myself.
There is a bunch of breast groups and the defining word in this one is
natural, so personally, I think any breasts that are not surgically
enhanced are on-topic.
I would say post what you like.
If anyone has a charter or FAQ for the group, could they please post
it.
|
|