On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:19:05 +1000, boing <boing@boing.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:55:23 -0400, Spermy Tonsilgloss
><spermeister@boobonicplague.cum> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:16:19 -0400, LAKing@NHAx.net wrote:
>>
>><SNIPPED>
>>>
>>>Look up "perfuntory" and you'll find Milena's picture.
>>
>>
>>Yeah, She is the poster child of perfunctory... but then her tits are
>>doing the work for her and the photographer. Nothing changes, if there
>>is no reason for it. At least, that's their thinking... deductively
>>inferred from a "perfunctory" observation on our part.
>>
>>Spermatazoa-y
>><O=~~~~~~~
>meh
Meh?
Pointless pontification or peremptory posing?
Both!
|
|