On Thu, 15 May 2014 07:01:36 +1000, boing <boing@boing.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 13 May 2014 17:52:32 GMT, atticus@finch.net (Atticus Finch)
>wrote:
>
>There is definitely a staleness to these sites which have been running
>with limited models for over a decade. A decade is a lifetime for a
>nude model - even the drop dead gorgeous ones.
>
>Pretty much every angle, location and prop has been used. Over the
>past year, I have somewhat expected things to scale into full nudity
>and beyond to keep an interested audience, but that also depends on
>what a model will stretch to anyway.
>
>I gave up on Nadine years ago, but have just kept Milena up to date
>for completeness. My tastes are slightly different I guess, as of the
>Daktari models, I prefer Milena. After around 16,500 monthy images and
>240 videos, I am not surprised she is losing her paying subscribers.
>Even if she went full hardcore like Miosotis, it would still only hold
>limited interest for a short time.
>
>Give them a gold watch, and we will move on to the new boobs that come
>along to replace them.
I disagree on the age thing. Uschi Digart came back to do sets when
she was older. I enjoyed them. Diane Poppos did as well. Those were
good.
I pray that Chelsea Charms and Beshine will be doing sets until they
are drawing their pensions.
A lot of the silicone queens of the 1990s retired and had reductions,
which was a crime a cruelty, if you as me.
There should be a law which compells them to come back every five
years and do a set for us.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.nospam.breasts.natural/431', 'Re: Goodbye Nadine and Milena Velba - "The End Is Nigh.jpg" yEnc (1/1)')){kind=link}