Don Kennyonie <msizlac@springfield.net> wrote in
news:XnsA3D2A1852479Dpinchenoffasteamerne@74.209.136.92:
>
> Hey Einstein!
>
> The compamy sets the QC, lower QC = higher profit!
>
> Ever heard of statistics - Well if you went beyound basic
>
> math you would know that it is how and when you sample.
>
> More samples = more data and that allows more adjustment in
>
> the process which reduces failure rate. That costs money.
>
> WD settled for lower cost at the expense of higher failure.
>
>
> ALL DRIVES FAIL! WOW I AM SO GLAD YOU TOLD ME!
>
>
> WD called, they want their chapstick back!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> x2lls wrote in news:0c7o4al9rf0at51c062pngr2mibe70ddpa@4ax.com:
>
>> On 25 Oct 2014 17:09:15 GMT, Don Kennyonie <msizlac@springfield.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>No problem, just as soon as I am done with the newer stuff.
>>>
>>>DK
>>>
>>>
>>>BTW - You didn't have one of those POS Western Digital Drives did you?
>>>
>>>Anywhere between 1% an 5% fail and THEY KNOW IT!
>>>
>>>Oh, they send you a new drive but all your stuff is gone forever.
>>>
>>>During an upgrade last year I bought a new 1 TB WD drive and
>>>transfered everything to it for reinstall on the new system.
>>>
>>>The POS died and years of stuff gone!
>>>
>>>Needless to say I DO NOT USE WD DRIVES!
>>>
>>>Toshiba seems good as it they show up in a number of new gaming
>>>machines.
>>>
>>>Samsung, Seagate, beware of Hitachi as they are now owned by WD
>>>anything but WD.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Do you really think that when a company gets taken over, they throw
>> away that company's manufacturing equipment?
>>
>> ALL drives fail, yes ALL!
>>
>> Ever heard of backups?
>>
>
just my 2 cents
i am with you on not using WD drives. the only one i ever had died
luckily i got most of the stuff back by asking for reposts etc
also KindaShy was reposting a lot of his stuff
also luckily (?) my mind is going so i can't remember what i had
dr.who?
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
|
 *Request*')){kind=link}