alt.binaries.nospam.breasts.naturalPrev. Next
Re: Should probably be in Saggy but WTF! - File 01 of 31 - chero31.jpg (1/2) UseNetServer.com
sleazoid (sleazoid@sleaze.net) 2014/08/02 10:14

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: sleazoid@sleaze.net
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.nospam.breasts.natural
Subject: Re: Should probably be in Saggy but WTF! - File 01 of 31 - chero31.jpg (1/2)
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 12:14:30 -0400
Message-ID: <vh3qt9193jhfmvrrct6uqhj5b28k24mqpa@4ax.com>
References: <XnsA37587A18C264pinchenoffasteamerne@74.209.136.97>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
Organization: UseNetServer.com
Lines: 4
X-Trace: f24f053dd0e3fe08d830c15373
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1470478383
X-Received-Bytes: 952
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.nospam.breasts.natural:251

On 25 Jul 2014 20:19:57 GMT, Don Kennyonie <msizlac@springfield.net>
wrote:

Saggy doesn't imply they're not natural - in fact, they usually are.

Next Prev. Article List         Favorite