In article <part1of1.1.1ZczkSLXrsgMkg@ue.ph>, Kvetch <kvetch@beaches.com>
wrote:
> I have several terabytes of various type of wonderful erotic images.
> I respect the name of the group as alt.binaries.nospam.
> breasts.natural. I know that there is nothing finer than a grand set
> of boobs, but there are models out there with beautiful sets of B's.
> Is size the major consideration or does shape and attractiveness play
> a part as well?
Natural breasts (as the name says) of any size. No silicone,
no implants. IOW, no fake tits. Not only is size not the major
consideration; it's not even a consideration.
In a case like this, it's always a good idea to read the group's
charter, which can be found at:
ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/control/alt/alt.binaries.nospam.breasts.natural.gz
And it says:
| From: pugsley@super.zippo.com (Pugsley)
| Newsgroups: alt.binaries.nospam.breasts.natural
| Subject: Cmsg newgroup alt.binaries.nospam.breasts.natural
| Control: newgroup alt.binaries.nospam.breasts.natural
| Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 22:01:13 GMT
| Organization: Pugscans
| Message-ID: <6e9lug$3jk@enews2.newsguy.com>
|
| For your newsgroups file:
| alt.binaries.nospam.breasts.natural Posting of binaries and discussion
| regarding the female breast not altered by surgery.
|
| This group would exist for the purpose of exchanging binaries and or
| discussion regarding the female breast(s) not altered by surgery. The
| "nospam" hierarchy is being proposed to reduce/eliminate the amount of
| off-topic advertising (spam)
| ...
|
|