On Wed, 07 May 2014 17:52:20 +0000, zup <zup@nowhere> wrote:
>Borg <Borg@Borg.com> wrote in news:
>
>> Looks like this is the final set of 'this' Sharona. Site begins using
>> a different model, but still using the name Sharona, beginning with
>> Set 61. And, believe you me, nothing AT ALL like the original Sharona.
>> No need to post the new one, IMHO. (I don't usually make a point of
>> criticizing models, individual taste being what it is, but I find the
>> new Sharona just this side of creepy.)
>
>I don't like her either or understand why they got rid of the original
>Sharona whom I rather thought was one of the better models they had.
I suspect they didn't get rid of her. Perhaps she (ie, her parents)
decided to leave them. But I do get annoyed when a site changes models
and keeps the same name in subsequent photo sets. (I didn't care for
Newstar's couple of switcheroos on the "Erin" model, either.) They
ought to the decency to give the new girl a new identity. I mean, it's
not like Superman, where Hollywood can keep the same character, played
by a different actor each film.
My thoughts, anyway.
Borg
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.newstar/133', 'Re: Sweet Sharona Set 060 - Thanks To OP 68 files - "sharona-060-073.jpg" yEnc (1/1)')){kind=link}