Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.newstar
Subject: Re: Sweet Sharona Set 060 - Thanks To OP 68 files - "sharona-060-073.jpg" yEnc (1/1)
From: zup <zup@nowhere>
References: <akL3v.7700$sa2.6612@fx33.am4> <riakm9tjk7gm77ndgt3oingk3j2qp85n8k@4ax.com>
Message-ID: <XnsA3266F5125E68zupnowhere@74.209.131.13>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
Organization: UseNetServer.com
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 17:52:20 +0000
Lines: 11
X-Trace: 660be536a72d432709e9224724
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4021331142
X-Received-Bytes: 1296
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.newstar:129
Borg <Borg@Borg.com> wrote in news:
> Looks like this is the final set of 'this' Sharona. Site begins using
> a different model, but still using the name Sharona, beginning with
> Set 61. And, believe you me, nothing AT ALL like the original Sharona.
> No need to post the new one, IMHO. (I don't usually make a point of
> criticizing models, individual taste being what it is, but I find the
> new Sharona just this side of creepy.)
I don't like her either or understand why they got rid of the original
Sharona whom I rather thought was one of the better models they had.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.newstar/129h', 'Re: Sweet Sharona Set 060 - Thanks To OP 68 files - "sharona-060-073.jpg" yEnc (1/1)')){kind=link}