In reply to "bigbill" who wrote the following:
> good luck with that one. - the only reason the 1932
> one is arround is because I paid to have a 16mm print made from the
> 35mm negative. have never run across the 38 in any form
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 16:18:23 -0600, Anon <anon@yahoo.com> wrote:
Thanks. I didn't even put out a request for the 1918 version because I've read
that has been lost, but I didn't know the 1938 version was lost as well.
--
----------------------------------------- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v7.0 Final
Free Newsreader @ http://www.newsleecher.com/
------------------------------- ----- ---- -- -
|
|