Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: here@the.net (Par Yer Rars)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.multimedia.vintage-film
Subject: Re: req: No No Nanette upgrade
Message-ID: <noqdudp5h9gt4sunh8bi883q5trm5trsmj@4ax.com>
References: <e4r4ud1brgsrb7op7tm2f43eovrrj6gcha@4ax.com> <woydnTOeE4OifH_GnZ2dnUU7-WHNnZ2d@giganews.com> <qqe6udtl6k5kfmg0fil8q2o7u0bos3daov@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 19
X-Complaints-To: abuse@tweaknews.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 14:31:43 UTC
Organization: Tweaknews
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 06:31:07 -0800
X-Received-Bytes: 1610
X-Received-Body-CRC: 650278437
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.multimedia.vintage-film:13610
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 14:25:26 -0500, bigbill <bill@bill.com> wrote:
>Thnaks - many years ago I had an original 16mm print of this film -
>well worn, as they say, I had a nice transfer of it made - and so far
>every copy I've seen is from that same print I sold 30+ years ago -
>I was always hoping a 35mm would turn up.
>
>same with Jayne Eyre - though I still own that 16mm -
>
>One day, these will turn up.
>
>again
>thanks
>
Do you know if the TCM DVD is of good Quality ?
https://shop.tcm.com/no-no-nanette/644827162222
details say released in 2015...the Amazon DVD appears
to be a 2008 release. All the versions I have seen are
very poor like you and Anon mention.
|
|