Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: bigbill <bill@bill.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.multimedia.vintage-film
Subject: Re: req: No No Nanette upgrade
Message-ID: <qqe6udtl6k5kfmg0fil8q2o7u0bos3daov@4ax.com>
References: <e4r4ud1brgsrb7op7tm2f43eovrrj6gcha@4ax.com> <woydnTOeE4OifH_GnZ2dnUU7-WHNnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 23
X-Complaints-To: http://abuse.usenetxs.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 19:25:28 UTC
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 14:25:26 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 1507
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3690335774
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.multimedia.vintage-film:13609
Thnaks - many years ago I had an original 16mm print of this film -
well worn, as they say, I had a nice transfer of it made - and so far
every copy I've seen is from that same print I sold 30+ years ago -
I was always hoping a 35mm would turn up.
same with Jayne Eyre - though I still own that 16mm -
One day, these will turn up.
again
thanks
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 06:57:35 -0600, Anon <anon@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In reply to "bigbill" who wrote the following:
>
>> has a really nice video of the 1940 film (or any fragments of the 1930
>> version) ever turned up?
>>
>> thanks
>
>I have a 720p rip of the 1940 version, but the original source is not great. If
>you want it I'll post it, but I don't think it's what you're looking for.
|
|