Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.multimedia.vintage-film
Subject: Re: Anyone have experience with H.265 codec? Just curious
From: "fred-bloggs" <fred-bloggs@hahahotmail.com>
References: <NaqdndSNf_fi_LjKnZ2dnUU7-YvNnZ2d@giganews.com>
Organization: fred-bloggs
User-Agent: Xnews/2009.05.01
Date: 01 May 2016 05:19:01 GMT
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <572591c5$0$22020$b1db1813$d2f06f9f@news.astraweb.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ccf4faba.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=jVQ[F7T9VEJmRUYobjn7jFL?0kYOcDh@JSSH;U<@TWoKjnG=QnNWagCY=L=BYPXn\OaUnnLZG?;jGMmV:lX2<73LG;55_2OYhlK1iKagAg0g4I
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1455384883
X-Received-Bytes: 1144
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.multimedia.vintage-film:11115
On Sun, 01 May 2016 01:52:55 GMT, "Orlac888" <d3zmhow+
0st11g@sharklasers.com> wrote
h265/HEVC is more efficient than h264/AVC at very low bitrates and is
currently being pushed for use on mobile telephones and 4K/UHD TVs. The
main problem for us is the lack of hardware media players. The royalties
for using the decompressor is 20x those for h264.
--
fred
|
|