Mickey K Shenanigan <MickeyShen22@EireMail.com> wrote in
news:l8srdb567bb6q9tjm1pqkrl8daj9g4h9hh@news.giganews.com:
> On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 15:00:58 -0500, "ficus@quark.net" <Ficus
> Panderota> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 04 Mar 2016 23:17:01 -0600, H.Caulfield@UConn.org (Holden
>>Caulfield) wrote:
>
>
> File segment .005 appears to be defective. All other segments are 61.8
> meg (64,896,000); .005 is 61.4 (64,474,180). The pars were most
> likely made with that defective file, so they think it is correct and
> show no need for repair.
>
> The uploader may wish to resplit the original file, so that all parts
> are good, and then create the pars.
>
> I'd be interested in watching this, but both uploads used the same
> damaged file, and the combined mp4 does not work.
>
> Mickey Shenanigan
>>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
The poster could not have verified the complete file when he created the
par files, as QuickPar informed me that one more file was needed when I
downloaded the whole 2GB of files posted and ran QuickPar. In addition VLC
would not play the first segment on its own. A poster always checks that
the split files join-up correctly to form one file, before the post is
executed.
Anyway, the video file has been perfectly posted by Duke and is great to
watch.
|
|