Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.multimedia.cooking:9182
Path: news.nzbot.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx41.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <part1of1.1.n7g$u5TTvq4Y7Q@ue.ph>
Subject: Re: REQ: Did I Miss AMTK Episodes?
From: dontno314 <dontno314@hushmail.com>
Organization: 314159.edu
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.multimedia.cooking
References: <utLSE.19860$fv7.946@fx08.fr7>
User-Agent: Usenet Explorer/v5.6 http://www.usenetexplorer.com
Lines: 34
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 20:13:57 UTC
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 20:13:57 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 2678
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2784825891
I'm not sure where the anger / ire came from in this post. And I don't want to
start a flame war.
I post to other groups under different names (mostly movies and docs) on as
request basis. Yes, some come from my collections of rips (50 Tb+) or other
sources. And I am familar with the folks at W4F and most of their posts wind up
on torrent in very short order.
All I wanted to know was whether any had or knew what had happened with those
episodes since the Wikopedia listed them, but not the total number of episodes
this season.
Why the tone? Or am I misreading your mood?
cooking <cooking@email.com> wrote:
>Really? Whether usenet posted or not doesn't matter? When is the last time
>someone in this group posted a requested item from a *private* capture? There
>are a couple of people in this grouop today that *create* original postings
>(and a thank-you to them!), but the vast vast majority of postings these days
>don't originate from folks directly participating in this group (even postings
>with abbreviated file names that don't credit the original source).
>Continuing - where do you think almost all of the *original postings* to this
>group (and usenet groups in general ...) come from? Yes, from teams of people
>that speciaize in a broad set of captures (like W4F and CAFFEiNE), that post
>them initially via very *private* distribution sites that then get
>redistributed from there to more generalized outlets - the most important of
>them being usenet distribution groups that originating/cataloging sties capture
>(usually with private access to sources for un-obfuscating filenames), and then
>ultimately this group, the file sharing sites, and eventually public torrents.
>So, bottom line, I can't remember the last time I saw an item like what is
>posted in this group on a file sharing site that didn't originate/also exist in
>usenet. So, whether something has been posted really does matter. Thank you
>very much.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|