Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.multimedia.cooking
Subject: Re: Was Ming 1404 ever posted? Casey posted an nzb but it was really 1406.. Thanks for all
From: casey <casey@nospam.com>
References: <0q0q7cpa2vjhr3olsfe9f5d09vhld9o5bs@4ax.com>
Message-ID: <XnsA6FFACD52E6A0caseynospamcom@127.0.0.1>
User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.24
Lines: 21
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:53:25 GMT
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1073430776
X-Received-Bytes: 1108
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.multimedia.cooking:7477
Fluffy <fluffy@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:0q0q7cpa2vjhr3olsfe9f5d09vhld9o5bs@4ax.com:
>
>
These are the NZBs I posted...
SnS.M1401.nzb
SnS.M1402.nzb
SnS.M1404.nzb
SnS.M1405.nzb
SnS.M1407.nzb
SnS.M1408.nzb
SnS.M1409.nzb
SnS.M1410.nzb
So, two were missing. Which two, I can't say, if the numbering
was problematic.
casey
|
|