Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!news.astraweb.com!border3.a.newsrouter.astraweb.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.neostrada.pl!unt-exc-02.news.neostrada.pl!peer04.fr7!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx36.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: GeoffE <GeoffEdwards@starcadetv.tv>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.multimedia.cooking
Subject: Re: a1605fld + higher bitrate :)
Message-ID: <u1evab9hboi3f1iinqrr9bluq1fg2pf04r@4ax.com>
References: <3fqqab9ni5q6ith4ckadh5nivchkt334lu@4ax.com> <4KadnSfcG-jWPjDLnZ2dnUU7-eOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <30asab5lhmnffr44fpao2nk1rgrdqrn0d4@4ax.com> <310120161909403502%reply@here.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 52
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 20:01:27 UTC
Organization: UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2016 15:01:41 -0500
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3051548006
X-Received-Bytes: 3160
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.multimedia.cooking:4628
Never stated had a 50" TV in my kitchen. In fact i have no TV in my
kicthen. I watch all these shows on my only TV set which is 50".
BTW the higher bitrate and 1080p it also looks noticeable better on
my 10.1 tablet [Samsung Galaxy Note 2014] but I digress...
It's 2016 bitrates should be geard for HiDef, and in 2015 the median
TV size sold in the united states was 50". Low bit rate and 720 will
ensure these shows will only look worse are tech advances. An extra
300-400MB to make sure they look ats good as possible given the point
in history we now live is less than peanuts.
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 19:09:40 -0800, PeggLeg <reply@here.net> wrote:
>While my input was neither asked for nor is it wanted (I'm sure!), I
>will have to agree with KtchnBtch on this. I've been in more than a few
>kitchens and not a single one has a 50" TV in them. My Neice, for
>example, has one of those that you mount under the shelves and it has
>about a 10" screen on it ( that folds away up inside it for
>compactness.) To help her cook something, I.m sure that it's great.
>1080X1920 would be silly for her. We should also take into
>consideration StutorNSs part in this. This person is taking their time
>to encode and post these vids and this is going to eat up their
>bandwidth and megs/gigs as well. If 720X1280 is better for them, I'm
>fine with it.
>Yes, 1605 IS actually 1603 but in a larger format.
>And StutorNS: Thank You for all of the work you do. I hope you enjoy
>doing it as well.
>Later...
>
>PeggLeg
>
>In article <30asab5lhmnffr44fpao2nk1rgrdqrn0d4@4ax.com>, GeoffE
><GeoffEdwards@starcadetv.tv> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 00:01:47 -0600, KtchnBtch <1@2.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Doesn't work for me. It's a cooking show, not a blockbuster movie.
>> >
>> >LOVE your big ass screen. Can't seem to fit it in my kitchen though.
>> >
>> >I just gotta do with the tablet. Ahhh, well.
>>
>>
>> 50" is not large in today's world. They cost less than a 32 inch did 4
>> years go. I just tested on my 10.1 table and the higher bit rate
>> looks more natural with deep color depth. The food simpley looks more
>> real. It's 2016 another 300-400MB is peanuts almost nothing in tech
>> cost less than storage.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
|