On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 19:09:40 -0800, PeggLeg <reply@here.net> wrote:
>While my input was neither asked for nor is it wanted (I'm sure!), I
>will have to agree with KtchnBtch on this. I've been in more than a few
>kitchens and not a single one has a 50" TV in them. My Neice, for
>example, has one of those that you mount under the shelves and it has
>about a 10" screen on it ( that folds away up inside it for
>compactness.) To help her cook something, I.m sure that it's great.
>1080X1920 would be silly for her. We should also take into
>consideration StutorNSs part in this. This person is taking their time
>to encode and post these vids and this is going to eat up their
>bandwidth and megs/gigs as well. If 720X1280 is better for them, I'm
>fine with it.
>Yes, 1605 IS actually 1603 but in a larger format.
>And StutorNS: Thank You for all of the work you do. I hope you enjoy
>doing it as well.
>Later...
>
>PeggLeg
>
>In article <30asab5lhmnffr44fpao2nk1rgrdqrn0d4@4ax.com>, GeoffE
><GeoffEdwards@starcadetv.tv> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 00:01:47 -0600, KtchnBtch <1@2.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Doesn't work for me. It's a cooking show, not a blockbuster movie.
>> >
>> >LOVE your big ass screen. Can't seem to fit it in my kitchen though.
>> >
>> >I just gotta do with the tablet. Ahhh, well.
>>
>>
>> 50" is not large in today's world. They cost less than a 32 inch did 4
>> years go. I just tested on my 10.1 table and the higher bit rate
>> looks more natural with deep color depth. The food simpley looks more
>> real. It's 2016 another 300-400MB is peanuts almost nothing in tech
>> cost less than storage.
I, too, have to agree with PeggLegg on this one. Having 1080p is fine
for a theatrical or even a scripted television program, but it seems
to be overkill for a cooking show. Star Wars, a travelogue touring
Europe or a nature documentary benefits from 1080p, but I'm not sure
that a cooking show merits that quality. Seems to me, anyway. 720p is
more than adequte, and what most cable systems broadcast in, anyway.
Herb Thymebaum
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
|