In article <rIednX6UE4iRUlLJnZ2dnUU7-Y-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, om nom nom
<1@2.com> wrote:
> Hi, SnS. Your titles and comments have been off by an
> episode or so lately.
> For instance 218 is not Sweetest of Sweets, but rather it
> deals with seared lamb chops. I been renaming mine as I get
> them so it's no big deal at all. Just thought I'd mention
> it as it may mess with your filing someday.
> And, as alw3ays, thanks so much for your work and posts.
> They may be more appreciated than you realize.
> Om
thanks for keeping track
the 218 I just psoted , and DL'd is the lamb show
the Sweetest of Sweets is 215, at least the 215 I have in Lidia's folder
so their may be more thatn one numbering system
I uses the one Ive attached, from KET.org
and this list matches what GBH broadcssts
that's about all I can saw about it
but thanks for keeping track
Ive made mistakes in the past, mostly when I Study Methode Rotuts
'early'
you ahve to go to eGullet.org to look into Methode Rotuts
Cheers
Happy Cooking
sns
|
|