On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:01:28 -0600, "nene"
<nenepil(nospam)@excite.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Snowy:
>
> well, well, well, well,....mhhhh, mhhhh just let me sharpen my
>fingers...hehehehe. Ok, ready !
>
> First you have to know that as same as Plovdiv side A LP, the catalog of
>Schubert work is a real mess too...hehehehe.
>
> Yeah ! hahaha The most accepted is the "D" thing which means Deutsch, and
>Deutsch is because one person named "Otto Erich Deutsch" listed almost all
>Schubert's works more or less chronologically, but time after, another guys
>started to add the Op things during Schubert's life and after, the Opus
>thing has to be when the work was published but not necessarylly means a
>chronological order like Deutsch catalog ( seems that he also liked data
>bases during that time too ...hahahaha ) .
>
> So :
> - All Shcubert's works has a " D " number
> - A few of them have the "D" number plus another Opus or Op number too
>( both tohether)
>
> So you will find some of them with opus number and a D number too and many
>others just with the D number only, i guess.
>
> Second :
>
> Schubert has composed the following Salve Reginas works as far i could
>find:
>
>D 27 Salve Regina in F for Soprano, Orchestra, and Organ
>D 106 Salve Regina in B flat major for Tenor, Orchestra, and Organ
>D 223 Salve Regina (Zweites Offertorium) in F for Soprano, orchestra, and
>organ Op 47
>D 379 Deutsches Salve Regina, in F
>D 386 Salve Regina For chorus in B flat
>D 676 Salve Regina (Drittes Offertorium, III or third ) in A major for
>soprano and orchestra Op posth 153
>D 811 Salve Regina in C Major for male voices and organ (Op. posth. 149)
>
> Notice that i have put the D number in the begining...ok ? and you don't
>have to worry about the op 153 because is the same as D 676 as same as op 47
>is the same thing than D 223
>
> Now the hard part, that would be the number three or third.....ahhhmmmm,
>Ok, let me listen those works and i will tell you tomorrow if i could
>find something about which one is which one....Ok ?
>
> Genious ??? Nope ! ! Just the Google thing...hahahahahahaha !!...Ok, let
>me listen them and i will tell you later, i think it is going to be easy
>because for sure in youtube there should be a lot of examples of each
>work....I hope so
>
>Ok see you
>
>nene
>
>
>
Many thanks for this illuminating reply.
I will waste no time correcting the entries in my database.
I feel I'm very lucky you deigned sharing your musicological (?)
knowledge with run of the mill collectors.
As for the George Banks-Martin clip, it does not matter since it was
not a real post but just something to identify :-)
|
|