On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 13:50:31 -0500, Charles F Frost <charles@f.frost>
wrote:
>In article <vhmlr9lmnjs2ok5ti9imvlm9brukt1qpr1@4ax.com>,
>ScoBoo <scottie@boozehouse.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm always forgetting where I left off and usually have to reload
>> headers to find out.
>
>Here's another way to find out ... bookmark this URL in your browser:
>
><http://binsearch.info/?server=2&g=alt.binaries.models.repost&a=Scottie%40boozehouse.com+%28ScoBoo%29>
>
>Binsearch always lists posts in reverse-chronological order, so whatever
>you see at the top of the list is where you left off most recently.
Too lazy to search.
>
>If you're going to post RARs, would you please consider also posting
>the first .jpg from each set, as a separate file, in addition to
>the .rar and .par2 files? Thanks! If you do that, it'll help those
>of us who don't routinely download every set. That way we can figure out,
>set by set, which ones we do want to download, without chewing up a lot of
>bandwidth and quota.
>
>Also, judging by what you've posted so far, you can make the RAR part size
>quite a bit larger if you want. That would mean fewer parts, fewer
>headers, and less clutter in the lists of articles that we look at, so
>it's a win all around. I don't have any particular numbers to give you,
>but whatever you're using now, try doubling it for starters, and after
>testing that, you might even try doubling it once again, and see how it
>goes. Just a thought. In other words, what you're doing now works OK,
>but there are way more .rar files than there need to be.
The thought of small rar's was so people could d-load a small part and
see what was in the file,
You don't like, Fuck you!!
That was my soberness talking, Just had a couple beers now, will see
what I can dooooooooo.
See my next post, Hope it works.
ScoBoo
|
|