In article <XnsA56D7760921A4bgmailc@69.16.179.38>, dr. who?
<noemail@none.com> wrote:
> i don't know
OK, thanks to you and goat both, for looking.
> but thanks for the tineye info
Yeah, tineye is great. An excellent free service. I've found a number
of picture sets that way, starting from having only one image of a
particular model or amateur, often something that was posted as an item
in a random collection. You look at the pic and say "I've never seen
her before, but there's got to be more of her out there somewhere",
and occasionally there is.
One really good thing about tineye is that the matching is very smart,
a sort of fuzzy-logic kind of thing that makes it possible to find
similar images, for instance copies of the same shot regardless of
different studio stamps or resolution or JPEG compression or whatever
it might be. IOW, it's nothing like a trivial checksum comparison that
merely says "Is B the same file as A?" Very impressive and useful.
|
|
 (yEnc)')){kind=link}