On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 11:12:17 -0500, JohnClark wrote,
>RT,
>
>Allow me to say thanks for all these great posts on behalf of the
>entire group. I'm not quite sure how many more sets are in this
>series, but please continue, to conclusion if possible!
There are 22 more sets of which I have 20.
>
>Two things - first, for some reason files na-166-23 through 52 seem to
>have not come through. Could you possibly resend?
See my reply to pisico to find the missing.
>
>Second, if you look back here earlier this month, Baldrick posted both
>sets 169 and 171 as .rar files. Hope that helps.
No, he really didn't. Those were placeholders, and he has simply reposted
the same placeholders. I don't post placeholders unless for very good
reason. I restrict my posting to known good copies. Placeholders are
everywhere, but you won't get them from me. I'm looking for files to match
n@@dles csv. I'm posting only files that match n@@dles csv.
I wrote what I did lest folks looking to finish their collection with the
long missing sets 169 & 171 asked me to continue thinking they were about
to get the real deal. They're not.
Thanks for writing.
>
>
>
>
>
>On 07 Nov 2008 23:55:17 GMT, Ruby Tuesday <once@theWall> wrote:
>
>>is underwhelming. Does anyone need these? Before you answer you should
>>know I don't have sets 169 & 171 either.
|
|