Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s03-b35!num02.iad!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.148.MISMATCH!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 05:24:21 -0500
From: enuff@already
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.jimmy
Subject: Re: Just a notion so there is no emotion...
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 06:24:19 -0400
Message-ID: <sion56hpcn2hmhgbuic9ffmlnf99mqkpd5@4ax.com>
References: <p79m56tglh1ft0ni246ct8nf1ih7obgfg8@4ax.com> <v5il56dpqk3msop4cr8a6hpq6svmc13s16@4ax.com> <5dC6o.36525$F%7.32074@newsfe10.iad> <ckR6o.38751$F%7.35495@newsfe10.iad>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 25
X-Trace: sv3-zwcZyqrkcXjeIN0lGTWPNqzU5AK/Tbmh8w6YIkXohK2wWZbJS/IdagkCMrIDWOg0FW/c6uOz4t5d/iO!PqrBEtO0u0ClOnxIp2chM55cIqVyUWnjhKK2j5wpnia4aJMN5zbzXz1LekCUh4TvuILzuaZw217K!AKsqCg==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.jimmy:1140
X-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:24:22 UTC (s03-b35)
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:18:48 GMT, here@heaven.com wrote:
sometimes u dont have a choice some soft ware if u want to use it
demand a fat 32 drive. just my 2 cents
>> I am not an expert on file systems, but I can easily state that there
>> are advantages and disadvantages in both files systems. However, I
>> think that NTFS overall is best suited for larger files, plus it
>> supports compression and encryption should you chose to use
>> Microsoft's weak EFS. (Which in itself is really a bad idea) Moreover,
>> I see no reason to use FAT32 on any of your drives…there is no
>> sensible point or advantage. You have a lot more control when using
>> NTFS. I don't think it makes any difference as far as security goes
>> when formatting an encrypted container. You can use both file systems.
>> Still, I recommend NTFS especially if you're going to format large
>> containers or whole drives.
>>
>
>
>I was talking about unecrypted partition because NTFS keep a %logfile where all modifications on files are logged (including name of files).
>This is not wiped by any software (as far as I know).
>FAT32 are easier to wipe (I guess).
>As it is very difficult to monitor what windows do with all temp files, bak, etc. it will be easier to control a FAT32 partition and i think risky to install windows on a NTFS.
>Well, for sure, the best is probably to encrypt the OS partition.
|
|