Path: news.nzbot.com!spool1.sonic-news.com!news-out.sonic-news.com!not.news-service.com!not.alt.net!not.highwinds-media.com!s03-b43!num02.iad!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.148.MISMATCH!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:09:07 -0500
From: Stinky@stinky.com
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.jimmy
Subject: Hey zylon - ur question has been ans several times in this group already - prob is too many people has to be spoon feed here - re tc and reading partial downloads
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:14:25 -0400
Message-ID: <ru7v46tle3qm6jt6af12q4hp8ag8puld70@4ax.com>
References: <ssadncjdTrZNO9PRnZ2dnUVZ8kOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <8n6u46hmg3sh0t01b364buo08vcda9h0p3@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 61
X-Trace: sv3-Fknd3t30xUrvKdSD1lt6phJuOS1oGDdCkAis7uxN8DjaXIv8bX+c+i/ddE6Jsvati24TlI20kVL0HfF!SkzT11Gpyslksl9Ssrg3CP4G+QzcRi4w8MY7CmDpo8rC04LBzD8DkI5xFcRm3U4Fjt8v19xEl0Nz!6OgtFw==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.jimmy:1072
X-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:09:07 UTC (s03-b43)
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:17:30 -0700, Zyklon <Zyklon@giftgas.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:28:48 -0500, Gandalf@TheWhite (Gandalf) wrote:
>
>Wow ! I guess we are getting real cryptic here, but why have to
>encrypt helpful information?.
> Why would this message (that I am replying to) have to be password
>protected when it simply lets everyone know that :
>
>"files encrypted with TC 7, are not TC 6.x compatible."
>
>Am I missing something here?
>
>That information alone will probably help out many people that have
>been (or were) having problems, including myself.
>
>Sure, everyone may already know the "reverse version of the original
>group password" to view it, but this is only helpful information to
>all.
>VERY helpful.
>
>Of course, the version that I have been fighting with for a over a
>week is 6.3, so there adds another variable into the equation of
>possible mistakes of it not working.
>
>Have you specifically stated what version YOU are using?
>Maybe I missed that post.
>
>And of course, that information regarding TC7 versus TC6 was not found
>in my TC 6.3 manual for obvious reasons.... they could not look into
>the future because they forgot their crystal ball on the day they
>compiled the new manual.
>
>So, after my Mel Gibson tirade, would this be a good time for me to
>ask a question that has been asked several times with no real answer
>given yet ??. It will be in CAPS, not to resemble yelling or
>screaming, but to make the question more visible.
>Here's the question:
>
>CAN A MULTIPLE PART TC POST BE VIEWED BY ONLY DOWNLOADING PART OF THE
>POST JUST TO SAMPLE THE POST FIRST WITHOUT HAVING TO DOWNLOAD THE
>ENTIRE POST?
>
>(caps lock off)
>
>Maybe no one understands the question or the reason?
>In winrar this is possible to download just a few parts of the post to
>see if they want the entire post. If this is NOT the case with TC,
>then it will obviously eliminate another possible mistake that I (and
>others ) may be making, since I have been trying to open the keyfiled
>posts with just several parts (first 5 or 10 parts, then combine).
>It is not a question that needs to be answered under some password
>protection or someone requesting that I e-mail them under some
>hushmail account, it is something helpful to all that can be posted
>regarding the capabilities of TC, and can be posted right here in this
>group openly for all to view.
>
>That's all, folks!
>
>Thanks.
>
|
|