Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: HowardsFear@hfear.info
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.howard-stern
Subject: Re: How can anyone listen to 24kbps?!
Message-ID: <k3a5m9d4k0efrbgvjbh0gj7ji24kdphd8b@4ax.com>
References: <k964m996cb9fhhled8obrco72t4ppdg9vi@4ax.com> <0001HW.CF87D9C600A2D968F01846D8@news.grandecom.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 13:03:41 -0700
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1073726210
X-Received-Bytes: 1859
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.howard-stern:83
On Thu, 1 May 2014 11:00:22 -0500, Tommy Boy <Tommy@Boy.com> wrote:
>Music sounds horrible at 24kbps. Vocal frequencies fit neatly into that
>range, so anything above that is oversampling.
>
>On Thu, 1 May 2014 04:56:05 -0500, HowardsFear@hfear.info wrote
>(in article <k964m996cb9fhhled8obrco72t4ppdg9vi@4ax.com>):
>
>> I see stuff posted here and elsewhere sometimes that is compressed to
>> 24kbps.
>> I have only one question:
>> For god's sake, WHY?! If you're going to record something and
>> distribute it, at least make it 48k kbps! At 24, it just sounds
>> harrible!
>> I remember back in the 60's I had a little AM radio the size of my
>> hand that I'd listen to late at night when I was supposed to be in bed
>> asleep, and even THAT sounded better than mp3's at 24kbps!
>>
>> JHEEZH!
>> p.s. excuse my rant but I just had to say it
>
You don't HEAR that tinny thin sound of 24kbps compressed voice???
|
|