On Thu, 01 May 2014 02:50:22 -0700, HowardsFear wrote:
> On 30 Apr 2014 20:05:47 GMT, "Eric T. Duckman"
> <eric_t_duckman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 06:02:07 -0700, HamHands wrote:
>>
>>> On 29 Apr 2014 17:31:09 GMT, "Eric T. Duckman"
>>> <eric_t_duckman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>With all due respect, are you kidding? The format Sirius XM uses to
>>>>broadcast is lossy; how can any post processing produce an improvement
>>>>that is good enough to overcome the additional losses/artifacts it
>>>>causes?
>>>
>>> Have a listen to my posting, and then another poster's.
>>>
>>> Keep in mind that you may need to reduce the volume of other postings
>>> for a fair comparison, as I encode closer to the MPEG working group
>>> reference level, so the psychoacoustic model can work correctly to
>>> dedicate bitrate to audio which can be perceived.
>>>
>>> This show in particular had audio deficiencies from the way it was
>>> mic'd. Just like Photoshop can sharpen a blurry photo and remove dust
>>> and noise, I can use the same artistic power to bring the perceived
>>> audio quality of a recording closer to a reference standard for audio
>>> recording or the normal sound profile of a Stern show.
>>
>>No thanks, I regret the time I spent listening to the show when it aired
>>live.
> Another Howard Hater For Howard! (Kind of like Jews For Jesus?)
I don't hate Howard, I just didn't find the Billy Joel show very
interesting or entertaining. And Jesus WAS a Jew, as were ALL of His
original disciples, so what's hateful about other Jews being FOR Him? If
you want to talk about contradictory relationships, ask why a man like
Howard, who has on numerous occasions portrayed the Polish people as being
a nation of backwards antisemites, has chosen to spend his golden years
married to one?
--
"...Amusing, yet not without a certain understated omniscience"
|
|