On 30 Apr 2014 20:05:47 GMT, "Eric T. Duckman"
<eric_t_duckman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 06:02:07 -0700, HamHands wrote:
>
>> On 29 Apr 2014 17:31:09 GMT, "Eric T. Duckman"
>> <eric_t_duckman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>With all due respect, are you kidding? The format Sirius XM uses to
>>>broadcast is lossy; how can any post processing produce an improvement
>>>that is good enough to overcome the additional losses/artifacts it
>>>causes?
>>
>> Have a listen to my posting, and then another poster's.
>>
>> Keep in mind that you may need to reduce the volume of other postings
>> for a fair comparison, as I encode closer to the MPEG working group
>> reference level, so the psychoacoustic model can work correctly to
>> dedicate bitrate to audio which can be perceived.
>>
>> This show in particular had audio deficiencies from the way it was
>> mic'd. Just like Photoshop can sharpen a blurry photo and remove dust
>> and noise, I can use the same artistic power to bring the perceived
>> audio quality of a recording closer to a reference standard for audio
>> recording or the normal sound profile of a Stern show.
>
>No thanks, I regret the time I spent listening to the show when it aired
>live.
Another Howard Hater For Howard! (Kind of like Jews For Jesus?)
|
|