On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 06:02:07 -0700, HamHands wrote:
> On 29 Apr 2014 17:31:09 GMT, "Eric T. Duckman"
> <eric_t_duckman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>With all due respect, are you kidding? The format Sirius XM uses to
>>broadcast is lossy; how can any post processing produce an improvement
>>that is good enough to overcome the additional losses/artifacts it
>>causes?
>
> Have a listen to my posting, and then another poster's.
>
> Keep in mind that you may need to reduce the volume of other postings
> for a fair comparison, as I encode closer to the MPEG working group
> reference level, so the psychoacoustic model can work correctly to
> dedicate bitrate to audio which can be perceived.
>
> This show in particular had audio deficiencies from the way it was
> mic'd. Just like Photoshop can sharpen a blurry photo and remove dust
> and noise, I can use the same artistic power to bring the perceived
> audio quality of a recording closer to a reference standard for audio
> recording or the normal sound profile of a Stern show.
No thanks, I regret the time I spent listening to the show when it aired
live.
--
"...Amusing, yet not without a certain understated omniscience"
|
|