Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: IronKing <why@whynot.edu>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.howard-stern
Subject: Re: Poll: WUS or NO WUS
Message-ID: <rnk3sbtdapppivgob0hqddrf4j56obkj5p@4ax.com>
References: <XnsA66F7A6DC403BSklit@216.166.97.131>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 160827-0, 08/27/2016), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 19
X-Complaints-To: abuse@frugalusenet.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 17:53:36 UTC
Organization: frugalusenet - www.frugalusenet.com
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:53:32 -0500
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1009443434
X-Received-Bytes: 1421
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.howard-stern:3473
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 12:02:16 -0500, Sklit <none@me.com> wrote:
>Debating on removing the WUS from the daily postings starting Jan 2017 and
>would like everyones' opinion for a informed decision. I will take the
>majority that wins under consideration.
>
>Yes: I would keep the WUS
>
>No: I would remove the WUS
Yes: I would keep the WUS
I'm years behind so I don't know how bad the WUS has become, but I
still want it. Thanks.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
|