On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 08:59:48 -0800, HamHands <HamHands@hh> wrote:
>It wasn't part 55 I was posting about, but the ones in my screenshot . It turns
>out that when testing, Quickpar protected part 55 from undetected corruption also,
>even though all the parts were on the news server (attached pic of recovery).
>
>You don't need to post more than one par2 for files this size; either do what I do
>and set quickpar for one recovery file at 10%+ redundancy (yes, you need to type "1"
>each time...), or you can set it at 30% and just post the smallest and largest PAR2s.
>
>On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:28:55 -0500, Ted The Janitor <jmk269@ptd.net> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 19:36:31 -0800, HamHands <HamHands@hh> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>I just tried posting some par files for Best of # 55. Let me know if
>>that fixes it for you HamHands?
Ok, pretty new to posting. I'll try Best of # 8 that you need. Let
me know if it works out for you and I'll get you the rest you need?
|
|