On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:12:07 -0500, C_Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote:
>On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:08:22 -0500, C_Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:45:25 -0700, ChinaFan
>><ChinaFan@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:57:35 -0500, C_Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 19:01:13 +0100, fuck@what.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 19 Apr 15 08:25:17 -0700, Garvy <w5gf10@po373m1.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>What part opf alt.binaries.erotica.NOSPAM.CREAMPIE don't you
>>>>>understand ?
>>>>>
>>>>>Where's the creampie and why are you spamming ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Here's a kill filter written by ChinaFan that will rid you of the spam
>>>>
>>>>Message-ID:
>>>>=%{<[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?@[a-z][a-z][a-z][a-z][a-z]\.com>}
>>>>
>>>>(Must be on one line, no carriage returns)
>>>>
>>>>Filter works in Agent 7, YMMV.
>>>>
>>>>Spammers don't read usenet.
>>>
>>>Message-ID:
>>>=%{<[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?@[0-9a-z][0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?\.com>}
>>>
>>>Spammer is now varying a little more what follows the "@".
>>
>>
>>Thank you CF, you're the best !
>>
>>B^]]
>
>
>PS
>
>Think the previous filter was getting >95%+ of the spams.
>
>Again, great work, you're the bestest ! :-)
Now dropping the "m" of "com".
Message-ID:
=%{<[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?@[0-9a-z][0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?[0-9a-z]?\.com?>}
--
cf
|
|
){kind=link}