On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 19:38:57 -0800, ChinaFan
<ChinaFan@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 09:12:01 -0600, C_Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 03:53:18 -0600, C_Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 20:31:15 -0800, ChinaFan
>>><ChinaFan@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:43:11 -0500, DocPapsm <stinkfinger@ou812.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Anybody have an Agent filter for this douche?
>>>>
>>>>Here ya go:
>>>>
>>>>Message-ID:
>>>>=%{<[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?\.[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]?[0-9a-f]?@[a-z][a-z][a-z][a-z][a-z]\.com>}
>>>
>>>
>>>Luv the filter, but which douche bag spammer ?
>>>
>>>Not seeing it I guess.
>>>
>>>Thanks cf, you are the best filter writer. Evah !
>>
>>
>>After further review, know which douche you mean.
>>
>>ChinaFan: WoW, that filter is a thing of beauty !
>> Well done, and thank you immensely !
>>
>>OK with you if I share the filter ?
>
>Hi, C_Ya.
>
>Be my guest. Posted an earlier version (not quite as comprehensive)
>to abme.asian a month or so ago. Even this one might be not quite
>complete; could let appx 16 messages through out of each million or
>so. To fix, insert one more question mark ("?") between the 6th
>(sixth) and 7th (seventh) "[0-9a-f]"s; this change would filter out
>also those message ids that have only 1 (one) hex digit in the second
>dotted component.
Thank You CF !!!
Consider it done.
-C_Ya
|
|