On Tue, 20 May 2014 20:53:11 GMT, Bookworm <Bookreader@kindle.com> wrote:
>In reply to "Bookworm" who wrote the following:
>
>> In reply to "Mel Books" who wrote the following:
>>
>> > On Tue, 20 May 2014 20:19:57 GMT, Bookworm <Bookreader@kindle.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > In reply to "Bookworm" who wrote the following:
>> > >
>> > > > In reply to "RIB" who wrote the following:
>> > > >
>> > > > > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 20:36:22 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 19:56:45 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 18:47:28 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:24:27 -0500, Flaco
>> > > > > > > > > > > > <Old_Fart@Home>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:22:45 -0500, Flaco
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > <Old_Fart@Home>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 18 May 2014 15:17:41 -0700, Lab Lover
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <Labs@rule.com>
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Incorrect. True conservatives value liberty above
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all.
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > purchase
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > little
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > temporary
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Benjamin Franklin
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Agreed, but the current crop of "right" are NOT
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "true
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > conservatives".
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > No sacrifice (of the Peoples' rights) is too great
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > protect
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > us
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > against terrorists. (see also "We had to destroy the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > village
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > order
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to save it." and "If it saves one childs life!")
>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > > I forgot "Only the Police should have guns."
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > The above philosphy is wholeheartedly embraced by the
>> > > > > > > > > > > > left
>> > > > > > > > > > > > wing,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Marxists,
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Communists and progressives. Trying to paint
>> > > > > > > > > > > > conservatives
>> > > > > > > > > > > > with
>> > > > > > > > > > > > this
>> > > > > > > > > > > > unattributed quote is completely fallacious.
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > I think your use of the word fallacious in this context is
>> > > > > > > > > > > completely
>> > > > > > > > > > > fallacious. Do you HAVE to sound like a complete knob! or
>> > > > > > > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > > > your
>> > > > > > > > > > > first
>> > > > > > > > > > > name
>> > > > > > > > > > > Sheldon?
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > How very Saul Alinsky of you. You have absolutely no
>> > > > > > > > > > counter
>> > > > > > > > > > argument, so
>> > > > > > > > > > you
>> > > > > > > > > > attack the person who made the statement.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > I am sorry if your vocabulary is not up to the discussion at
>> > > > > > > > > > hand.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > I will show you the pity you deserve, here is the definition
>> > > > > > > > > > of
>> > > > > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > > word
>> > > > > > > > > > you
>> > > > > > > > > > object to.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > adj.
>> > > > > > > > > > 1. Containing or based on a fallacy: a fallacious
>> > > > > > > > > > assumption.
>> > > > > > > > > > 2. Tending to mislead; deceptive: fallacious testimony.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Remember, it is never to late for you to get a high school
>> > > > > > > > > > diploma.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I'm assuming "to" instead of "too" was a typo? or are you in
>> > > > > > > > > need of
>> > > > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > high
>> > > > > > > > > school deploma yourself. Talk about the kettle calling the pot
>> > > > > > > > > black
>> > > > > > > > > -
>> > > > > > > > > Hypocrite.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I know only "too" well the meaning of the word fallacious.
>> > > > > > > > > that's
>> > > > > > > > > EXACTLY
>> > > > > > > > > what
>> > > > > > > > > I'm accusing you of being. You REALLY ARE A KNOB! It's been a
>> > > > > > > > > long
>> > > > > > > > > time
>> > > > > > > > > since
>> > > > > > > > > I've seen someone in the groups as far up his own arse as you.
>> > > > > > > > > A
>> > > > > > > > > "Sheldon"
>> > > > > > > > > indeed. LMAO! Clue - "Sheldon" - "Big Bang Theory" Take a look
>> > > > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > > cringe.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Ad hominem attacks are an excellent indication you have
>> > > > > > > > absolutely
>> > > > > > > > nothing
>> > > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > contribute to the topic at hand. Thanks for playing, I accept
>> > > > > > > > your
>> > > > > > > > surrender.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I love how liberals are incapable of conducting a civil debate
>> > > > > > > > and
>> > > > > > > > can
>> > > > > > > > only
>> > > > > > > > attack, but do so in such an ineffectual manner.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > ---------------------------------------
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Ineffectual? You don't even know what this thread is supposed to
>> > > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > about.
>> > > > > > > UKIP!
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > You don't have a clue do you? What a waste of space you are.
>> > > > > > > You've
>> > > > > > > completely
>> > > > > > > lost the meaning of this thread "Sheldon" By the way - I'm
>> > > > > > > apolitical -
>> > > > > > > Just
>> > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > re-affirm my assertion that you are talking a load of "fallacious
>> > > > > > > bull".
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > You behave as a screaming, feces throwing Howler monkey. So far,
>> > > > > > you
>> > > > > > have
>> > > > > > not
>> > > > > > made a single salient point, you simply rant and throw your own
>> > > > > > waste.
>> > > > > > I
>> > > > > > suspect in between posts you drink your own urine.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > So now you are slinging unrelated insults out of desperation!
>> > > > > Good grief! Just look at what you've written. This thread is about
>> > > > > UKIP!
>> > > > > -
>> > > > > NOT
>> > > > > YOUR petty political views.I'm assuming the only salient points here
>> > > > > are
>> > > > > Yours!
>> > > > > Time to put your sorry narcissistic ass into my killfile. Bye!
>> > > >
>> > > > Hey RIB! Just been looking through this thread. I can't believe this
>> > > > asshole
>> > > > doesn't realize how stupid he's made himself look. Pity you plonked him.
>> > > > His
>> > > > rants are hilarious hahaha!
>> > >
>> > > Update. This idiot thinks we are the same person. Wonder if it's because
>> > > we
>> > > share the same Internet service provider LMOA.That's just plain PARANOID!
>> > > I
>> > > still think his rants are hilarious.
>> > >
>> > > Hahaha!
>> > >
>> > > Ok! I know - you ain't interested.
>> >
>> > ROTFLMAO........ :-)
>>
>> ---------------------------------------
>>
>> Time to let this TWERP! go I think bookworm. Thanks again for the support.
>>
>> RIB.
>
>---------------------------------------
>
>Time to let this TWERP! go I think bookworm. Thanks again for the support.
>
>RIB.
>
Fuck, you post as Bookworm and you sign the post RIB (and you did it twice)! I
suspect if you call your psychiatrist and politely plead with him, you could get
an appointment tomorrow......
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 |
|