In reply to "Mel Books" who wrote the following:
> On Tue, 20 May 2014 20:19:57 GMT, Bookworm <Bookreader@kindle.com> wrote:
>
> > In reply to "Bookworm" who wrote the following:
> >
> > > In reply to "RIB" who wrote the following:
> > >
> > > > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 20:36:22 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 19:56:45 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 18:47:28 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:24:27 -0500, Flaco <Old_Fart@Home>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:22:45 -0500, Flaco
> > > > > > > > > > > > <Old_Fart@Home>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 18 May 2014 15:17:41 -0700, Lab Lover
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <Labs@rule.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Incorrect. True conservatives value liberty above
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > all.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > purchase
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > little
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > temporary
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Benjamin Franklin
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Agreed, but the current crop of "right" are NOT "true
> > > > > > > > > > > > > conservatives".
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > No sacrifice (of the Peoples' rights) is too great to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > protect
> > > > > > > > > > > > > us
> > > > > > > > > > > > > against terrorists. (see also "We had to destroy the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > village
> > > > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > order
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to save it." and "If it saves one childs life!")
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I forgot "Only the Police should have guns."
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The above philosphy is wholeheartedly embraced by the left
> > > > > > > > > > > wing,
> > > > > > > > > > > Marxists,
> > > > > > > > > > > Communists and progressives. Trying to paint
> > > > > > > > > > > conservatives
> > > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > unattributed quote is completely fallacious.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I think your use of the word fallacious in this context is
> > > > > > > > > > completely
> > > > > > > > > > fallacious. Do you HAVE to sound like a complete knob! or is
> > > > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > name
> > > > > > > > > > Sheldon?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > How very Saul Alinsky of you. You have absolutely no counter
> > > > > > > > > argument, so
> > > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > attack the person who made the statement.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I am sorry if your vocabulary is not up to the discussion at
> > > > > > > > > hand.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I will show you the pity you deserve, here is the definition
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > word
> > > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > object to.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > adj.
> > > > > > > > > 1. Containing or based on a fallacy: a fallacious assumption.
> > > > > > > > > 2. Tending to mislead; deceptive: fallacious testimony.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Remember, it is never to late for you to get a high school
> > > > > > > > > diploma.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm assuming "to" instead of "too" was a typo? or are you in
> > > > > > > > need of
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > high
> > > > > > > > school deploma yourself. Talk about the kettle calling the pot
> > > > > > > > black
> > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > Hypocrite.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I know only "too" well the meaning of the word fallacious.
> > > > > > > > that's
> > > > > > > > EXACTLY
> > > > > > > > what
> > > > > > > > I'm accusing you of being. You REALLY ARE A KNOB! It's been a
> > > > > > > > long
> > > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > since
> > > > > > > > I've seen someone in the groups as far up his own arse as you. A
> > > > > > > > "Sheldon"
> > > > > > > > indeed. LMAO! Clue - "Sheldon" - "Big Bang Theory" Take a look
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > cringe.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ad hominem attacks are an excellent indication you have absolutely
> > > > > > > nothing
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > contribute to the topic at hand. Thanks for playing, I accept
> > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > surrender.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I love how liberals are incapable of conducting a civil debate and
> > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > only
> > > > > > > attack, but do so in such an ineffectual manner.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ineffectual? You don't even know what this thread is supposed to be
> > > > > > about.
> > > > > > UKIP!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You don't have a clue do you? What a waste of space you are. You've
> > > > > > completely
> > > > > > lost the meaning of this thread "Sheldon" By the way - I'm
> > > > > > apolitical -
> > > > > > Just
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > re-affirm my assertion that you are talking a load of "fallacious
> > > > > > bull".
> > > > >
> > > > > You behave as a screaming, feces throwing Howler monkey. So far, you
> > > > > have
> > > > > not
> > > > > made a single salient point, you simply rant and throw your own waste.
> > > > > I
> > > > > suspect in between posts you drink your own urine.
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > > So now you are slinging unrelated insults out of desperation!
> > > > Good grief! Just look at what you've written. This thread is about UKIP!
> > > > -
> > > > NOT
> > > > YOUR petty political views.I'm assuming the only salient points here are
> > > > Yours!
> > > > Time to put your sorry narcissistic ass into my killfile. Bye!
> > >
> > > Hey RIB! Just been looking through this thread. I can't believe this
> > > asshole
> > > doesn't realize how stupid he's made himself look. Pity you plonked him.
> > > His
> > > rants are hilarious hahaha!
> >
> > Update. This idiot thinks we are the same person. Wonder if it's because we
> > share the same Internet service provider LMOA.That's just plain PARANOID! I
> > still think his rants are hilarious.
> >
> > Hahaha!
> >
> > Ok! I know - you ain't interested.
>
> ROTFLMAO........ :-)
---------------------------------------
Time to let this TWERP! go I think bookworm. Thanks again for the support.
RIB.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 |
|