Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-03.inet.qwest.net!195.208.113.1.MISMATCH!goblin3!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!peer03.am1!peering.am1!peer01.fr7!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mel Books <mel@books.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.e-books
Subject: Re: Anyone else think Historiker is standing as a candidate for UKIP? <<< What's UKIP mean?
Message-ID: <jcenn9p9o0naf1dd6g6c26ekc574r88laj@4ax.com>
References: <M3Oev.109478$U33.85900@fx11.fr7> <NNOev.26213$eK1.4773@fx12.fr7>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 164
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 13:23:23 -0700
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2380079125
X-Received-Bytes: 7624
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.e-books:227
On Tue, 20 May 2014 20:19:57 GMT, Bookworm <Bookreader@kindle.com> wrote:
>In reply to "Bookworm" who wrote the following:
>
>> In reply to "RIB" who wrote the following:
>>
>> > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
>> >
>> > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 20:36:22 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 19:56:45 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 18:47:28 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:24:27 -0500, Flaco <Old_Fart@Home>
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:22:45 -0500, Flaco <Old_Fart@Home>
>> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 18 May 2014 15:17:41 -0700, Lab Lover
>> > > > > > > > > > > <Labs@rule.com>
>> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Incorrect. True conservatives value liberty above all.
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase
>> > > > > > > > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > > > > > > little
>> > > > > > > > > > > > temporary
>> > > > > > > > > > > > Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > > -Benjamin Franklin
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > Agreed, but the current crop of "right" are NOT "true
>> > > > > > > > > > > conservatives".
>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > > No sacrifice (of the Peoples' rights) is too great to
>> > > > > > > > > > > protect
>> > > > > > > > > > > us
>> > > > > > > > > > > against terrorists. (see also "We had to destroy the
>> > > > > > > > > > > village
>> > > > > > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > > > order
>> > > > > > > > > > > to save it." and "If it saves one childs life!")
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > I forgot "Only the Police should have guns."
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > The above philosphy is wholeheartedly embraced by the left
>> > > > > > > > > wing,
>> > > > > > > > > Marxists,
>> > > > > > > > > Communists and progressives. Trying to paint conservatives
>> > > > > > > > > with
>> > > > > > > > > this
>> > > > > > > > > unattributed quote is completely fallacious.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I think your use of the word fallacious in this context is
>> > > > > > > > completely
>> > > > > > > > fallacious. Do you HAVE to sound like a complete knob! or is
>> > > > > > > > your
>> > > > > > > > first
>> > > > > > > > name
>> > > > > > > > Sheldon?
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > How very Saul Alinsky of you. You have absolutely no counter
>> > > > > > > argument, so
>> > > > > > > you
>> > > > > > > attack the person who made the statement.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I am sorry if your vocabulary is not up to the discussion at hand.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I will show you the pity you deserve, here is the definition of
>> > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > word
>> > > > > > > you
>> > > > > > > object to.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > adj.
>> > > > > > > 1. Containing or based on a fallacy: a fallacious assumption.
>> > > > > > > 2. Tending to mislead; deceptive: fallacious testimony.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Remember, it is never to late for you to get a high school
>> > > > > > > diploma.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > ------------------------------------
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I'm assuming "to" instead of "too" was a typo? or are you in need of
>> > > > > > a
>> > > > > > high
>> > > > > > school deploma yourself. Talk about the kettle calling the pot black
>> > > > > > -
>> > > > > > Hypocrite.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I know only "too" well the meaning of the word fallacious. that's
>> > > > > > EXACTLY
>> > > > > > what
>> > > > > > I'm accusing you of being. You REALLY ARE A KNOB! It's been a long
>> > > > > > time
>> > > > > > since
>> > > > > > I've seen someone in the groups as far up his own arse as you. A
>> > > > > > "Sheldon"
>> > > > > > indeed. LMAO! Clue - "Sheldon" - "Big Bang Theory" Take a look and
>> > > > > > cringe.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Ad hominem attacks are an excellent indication you have absolutely
>> > > > > nothing
>> > > > > to
>> > > > > contribute to the topic at hand. Thanks for playing, I accept your
>> > > > > surrender.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I love how liberals are incapable of conducting a civil debate and can
>> > > > > only
>> > > > > attack, but do so in such an ineffectual manner.
>> > > >
>> > > > ---------------------------------------
>> > > >
>> > > > Ineffectual? You don't even know what this thread is supposed to be
>> > > > about.
>> > > > UKIP!
>> > > >
>> > > > You don't have a clue do you? What a waste of space you are. You've
>> > > > completely
>> > > > lost the meaning of this thread "Sheldon" By the way - I'm apolitical -
>> > > > Just
>> > > > to
>> > > > re-affirm my assertion that you are talking a load of "fallacious bull".
>> > >
>> > > You behave as a screaming, feces throwing Howler monkey. So far, you have
>> > > not
>> > > made a single salient point, you simply rant and throw your own waste. I
>> > > suspect in between posts you drink your own urine.
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------
>> > So now you are slinging unrelated insults out of desperation!
>> > Good grief! Just look at what you've written. This thread is about UKIP! -
>> > NOT
>> > YOUR petty political views.I'm assuming the only salient points here are
>> > Yours!
>> > Time to put your sorry narcissistic ass into my killfile. Bye!
>>
>> Hey RIB! Just been looking through this thread. I can't believe this asshole
>> doesn't realize how stupid he's made himself look. Pity you plonked him. His
>> rants are hilarious hahaha!
>
>Update. This idiot thinks we are the same person. Wonder if it's because we
>share the same Internet service provider LMOA.That's just plain PARANOID! I
>still think his rants are hilarious.
>
>Hahaha!
>
>Ok! I know - you ain't interested.
ROTFLMAO........ :-)
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 |
|