Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!newspeer1.nac.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.fr7!fx11.fr7.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: RIB <rib@rack.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.e-books
Subject: Re: Anyone else think Historiker is standing as a candidate for UKIP? <<< What's UKIP mean?
X-Newsreader: NewsLeecher v6.5 Beta 4 (http://www.newsleecher.com)
References: <M3Oev.109478$U33.85900@fx11.fr7>
Lines: 162
Message-ID: <rtOev.109480$U33.34405@fx11.fr7>
X-Complaints-To: http://www.newsleecher.com/support/
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 19:58:15 UTC
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 19:58:15 GMT
X-Received-Body-CRC: 874033683
X-Received-Bytes: 7004
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.e-books:223
In reply to "Bookworm" who wrote the following:
> In reply to "RIB" who wrote the following:
>
> > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
> >
> > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 20:36:22 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 19:56:45 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 18:47:28 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:24:27 -0500, Flaco <Old_Fart@Home>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:22:45 -0500, Flaco <Old_Fart@Home>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 18 May 2014 15:17:41 -0700, Lab Lover
> > > > > > > > > > > <Labs@rule.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Incorrect. True conservatives value liberty above all.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase
> > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > little
> > > > > > > > > > > > temporary
> > > > > > > > > > > > Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > -Benjamin Franklin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Agreed, but the current crop of "right" are NOT "true
> > > > > > > > > > > conservatives".
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > No sacrifice (of the Peoples' rights) is too great to
> > > > > > > > > > > protect
> > > > > > > > > > > us
> > > > > > > > > > > against terrorists. (see also "We had to destroy the
> > > > > > > > > > > village
> > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > order
> > > > > > > > > > > to save it." and "If it saves one childs life!")
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I forgot "Only the Police should have guns."
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The above philosphy is wholeheartedly embraced by the left
> > > > > > > > > wing,
> > > > > > > > > Marxists,
> > > > > > > > > Communists and progressives. Trying to paint conservatives
> > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > unattributed quote is completely fallacious.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think your use of the word fallacious in this context is
> > > > > > > > completely
> > > > > > > > fallacious. Do you HAVE to sound like a complete knob! or is
> > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > name
> > > > > > > > Sheldon?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How very Saul Alinsky of you. You have absolutely no counter
> > > > > > > argument, so
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > attack the person who made the statement.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am sorry if your vocabulary is not up to the discussion at hand.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I will show you the pity you deserve, here is the definition of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > word
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > object to.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > adj.
> > > > > > > 1. Containing or based on a fallacy: a fallacious assumption.
> > > > > > > 2. Tending to mislead; deceptive: fallacious testimony.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Remember, it is never to late for you to get a high school
> > > > > > > diploma.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm assuming "to" instead of "too" was a typo? or are you in need of
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > high
> > > > > > school deploma yourself. Talk about the kettle calling the pot black
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > Hypocrite.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I know only "too" well the meaning of the word fallacious. that's
> > > > > > EXACTLY
> > > > > > what
> > > > > > I'm accusing you of being. You REALLY ARE A KNOB! It's been a long
> > > > > > time
> > > > > > since
> > > > > > I've seen someone in the groups as far up his own arse as you. A
> > > > > > "Sheldon"
> > > > > > indeed. LMAO! Clue - "Sheldon" - "Big Bang Theory" Take a look and
> > > > > > cringe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ad hominem attacks are an excellent indication you have absolutely
> > > > > nothing
> > > > > to
> > > > > contribute to the topic at hand. Thanks for playing, I accept your
> > > > > surrender.
> > > > >
> > > > > I love how liberals are incapable of conducting a civil debate and can
> > > > > only
> > > > > attack, but do so in such an ineffectual manner.
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Ineffectual? You don't even know what this thread is supposed to be
> > > > about.
> > > > UKIP!
> > > >
> > > > You don't have a clue do you? What a waste of space you are. You've
> > > > completely
> > > > lost the meaning of this thread "Sheldon" By the way - I'm apolitical -
> > > > Just
> > > > to
> > > > re-affirm my assertion that you are talking a load of "fallacious bull".
> > >
> > > You behave as a screaming, feces throwing Howler monkey. So far, you have
> > > not
> > > made a single salient point, you simply rant and throw your own waste. I
> > > suspect in between posts you drink your own urine.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > So now you are slinging unrelated insults out of desperation!
> > Good grief! Just look at what you've written. This thread is about UKIP! -
> > NOT
> > YOUR petty political views.I'm assuming the only salient points here are
> > Yours!
> > Time to put your sorry narcissistic ass into my killfile. Bye!
>
> Hey RIB! Just been looking through this thread. I can't believe this asshole
> doesn't realize how stupid he's made himself look. Pity you plonked him. His
> rants are hilarious hahaha!
----------------------------------------------
I've been on usenet since 1980 and I rarely come across someone as fare up his
own arse as this guy.
Thanks for the support Bookworm but Idiots like this moron STAY in my killfile.
Not interested in what he might have to say.
RIB.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 |
|