Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border2.newsrouter.astraweb.com!newspeer1.nac.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 20:12:33 -0500
From: Gunner Asch <gunnerasch@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.e-books
Subject: Re: Anyone else think Historiker is standing as a candidate for UKIP? <<< What's UKIP mean?
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 18:12:35 -0700
Organization: Coyote Engineering
Reply-To: gunnerasch AT gmail.com
Message-ID: <ttaln9177sdihpju3s783adknn5keolu59@4ax.com>
References: <klckn9pe51op7cfspi8rofv8f9cagvfi4e@4ax.com> <4lsev.40068$dF4.10033@fx27.fr7> <lhkkn91m0blepri2n3rbe0be8rv2rt0lbi@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 73
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-K4Z8kcK+/PDDOAnYAENIWRkpe2f8wpDNkdCjJggcOvfTFzYe8g6f8tYLNOOUcs4Vxk3JsTBgz/wDp+Q!Wl5l3mff+GpdNXSd5HVdbhoQpE5Jxdk+CmJny4CwKz2537uo0ygv4bygu6V8l3kAmgphY4WG
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 4004
X-Received-Body-CRC: 857955870
X-Received-Bytes: 4256
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.e-books:207
On Mon, 19 May 2014 11:54:27 -0700, Lab Lover <Labs@rule.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 19 May 2014 18:47:28 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
>
>>In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
>>
>>> On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:24:27 -0500, Flaco <Old_Fart@Home> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:22:45 -0500, Flaco <Old_Fart@Home> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > On Sun, 18 May 2014 15:17:41 -0700, Lab Lover <Labs@rule.com> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Incorrect. True conservatives value liberty above all.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
>>> > > > temporary
>>> > > > Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -Benjamin Franklin
>>> > >
>>> > > Agreed, but the current crop of "right" are NOT "true conservatives".
>>> > >
>>> > > No sacrifice (of the Peoples' rights) is too great to protect us
>>> > > against terrorists. (see also "We had to destroy the village in order
>>> > > to save it." and "If it saves one childs life!")
>>> >
>>> > I forgot "Only the Police should have guns."
>>>
>>> The above philosphy is wholeheartedly embraced by the left wing, Marxists,
>>> Communists and progressives. Trying to paint conservatives with this
>>> unattributed quote is completely fallacious.
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------
>>
>>I think your use of the word fallacious in this context is completely
>>fallacious. Do you HAVE to sound like a complete knob! or is your first name
>>Sheldon?
>
>How very Saul Alinsky of you. You have absolutely no counter argument, so you
>attack the person who made the statement.
>
>I am sorry if your vocabulary is not up to the discussion at hand.
>
>I will show you the pity you deserve, here is the definition of the word you
>object to.
>
>adj.
>1. Containing or based on a fallacy: a fallacious assumption.
>2. Tending to mislead; deceptive: fallacious testimony.
>
>Remember, it is never to late for you to get a high school diploma.
I dont think the poor bugger is smart enough to get a HS diploma.
Perhaps from one of those Special Schools....?
Or an ad in the back of a cheap porn magazine.....
Gunner
--
"
that he favored total civilian firearms confiscation.
Only the military and police should have weapons he averred and what did I think about that?
I began to give him a reasoned answer and he
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 |
|