In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
> On Mon, 19 May 2014 19:56:45 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
>
> > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
> >
> > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 18:47:28 GMT, RIB <rib@rack.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In reply to "Lab Lover" who wrote the following:
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:24:27 -0500, Flaco <Old_Fart@Home> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:22:45 -0500, Flaco <Old_Fart@Home> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sun, 18 May 2014 15:17:41 -0700, Lab Lover <Labs@rule.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Incorrect. True conservatives value liberty above all.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
> > > > > > > > temporary
> > > > > > > > Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Benjamin Franklin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Agreed, but the current crop of "right" are NOT "true
> > > > > > > conservatives".
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > No sacrifice (of the Peoples' rights) is too great to protect us
> > > > > > > against terrorists. (see also "We had to destroy the village in
> > > > > > > order
> > > > > > > to save it." and "If it saves one childs life!")
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I forgot "Only the Police should have guns."
> > > > >
> > > > > The above philosphy is wholeheartedly embraced by the left wing,
> > > > > Marxists,
> > > > > Communists and progressives. Trying to paint conservatives with this
> > > > > unattributed quote is completely fallacious.
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > I think your use of the word fallacious in this context is completely
> > > > fallacious. Do you HAVE to sound like a complete knob! or is your first
> > > > name
> > > > Sheldon?
> > >
> > > How very Saul Alinsky of you. You have absolutely no counter argument, so
> > > you
> > > attack the person who made the statement.
> > >
> > > I am sorry if your vocabulary is not up to the discussion at hand.
> > >
> > > I will show you the pity you deserve, here is the definition of the word
> > > you
> > > object to.
> > >
> > > adj.
> > > 1. Containing or based on a fallacy: a fallacious assumption.
> > > 2. Tending to mislead; deceptive: fallacious testimony.
> > >
> > > Remember, it is never to late for you to get a high school diploma.
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > I'm assuming "to" instead of "too" was a typo? or are you in need of a high
> > school deploma yourself. Talk about the kettle calling the pot black -
> > Hypocrite.
> >
> > I know only "too" well the meaning of the word fallacious. that's EXACTLY
> > what
> > I'm accusing you of being. You REALLY ARE A KNOB! It's been a long time
> > since
> > I've seen someone in the groups as far up his own arse as you. A "Sheldon"
> > indeed. LMAO! Clue - "Sheldon" - "Big Bang Theory" Take a look and cringe.
>
> Ad hominem attacks are an excellent indication you have absolutely nothing to
> contribute to the topic at hand. Thanks for playing, I accept your surrender.
>
> I love how liberals are incapable of conducting a civil debate and can only
> attack, but do so in such an ineffectual manner.
---------------------------------------
Ineffectual? You don't even know what this thread is supposed to be about. UKIP!
You don't have a clue do you? What a waste of space you are. You've completely
lost the meaning of this thread "Sheldon" By the way - I'm apolitical - Just to
re-affirm my assertion that you are talking a load of "fallacious bull".
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 |
|