alt.binaries.e-booksPrev. Next
Re: Anyone else think Historiker is standing as a candidate for UKIP? <<< What's UKIP mean?
Flaco (Old_Fart@Home) 2014/05/19 09:22

Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border2.newsrouter.astraweb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-02.inet.qwest.net!195.208.113.67.MISMATCH!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.posted.internetamerica!news.posted.internetamerica.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 10:22:37 -0500
From: Flaco <Old_Fart@Home>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.e-books
Subject: Re: Anyone else think Historiker is standing as a candidate for UKIP? <<< What's UKIP mean?
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 10:22:45 -0500
Message-ID: <eu7kn91ijkrbub50jer2t1d3ili7eombjo@4ax.com>
References: <nfadnWkrZ653QeXOnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@supernews.com> <e07in95i5jl6opee0ivhrmdoed5j2bfaej@4ax.com> <5v9in913ko1gqhd66rnjq3uv99359mvmn9@4ax.com> <a7cin9puvlvps991d2grmuq8vagrkh0kff@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 16
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.12.76.154
X-Trace: sv3-9UPzf6eopTGNpZBPWkyRCACdMVMNGGanX3cKnvNlpeeH6sKxnklsPrkzih6Zxcil1b2KiDr+m1uieBC!6X3LUWDM02AqlLEoqU1dm1A3+sKd2Ev9knzeFGgYP7v2Pv/KBQ3VwMj+VYIcu1HTt6Ub69vdROaa!s3wAUvVJNtd+
X-Complaints-To: abuse@airmail.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@airmail.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1900
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2693534868
X-Received-Bytes: 2153
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.e-books:194

On Sun, 18 May 2014 15:17:41 -0700, Lab Lover <Labs@rule.com> wrote:


>
>Incorrect.  True conservatives value liberty above all.
>
>"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary
>Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
>
>-Benjamin Franklin

Agreed, but the current crop of "right" are NOT "true conservatives".

No sacrifice (of the Peoples' rights) is too great to protect us
against terrorists. (see also "We had to destroy the village in order
to save it."  and "If it saves one childs life!")

Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
303132333435363738394041424344454647
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite