On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 00:34:43 +0100 (CET), Dave U. Random
<anonymous@anonymitaet-im-inter.net> wrote:
>In article <p1775a5jdudarni48fr28ad9icou10tt1t@4ax.com>
>Mr. 2 Cents <noname@noname.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 07:09:57 -0400, kevinp <kevinp@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >>>
>> >>>Thanks for the advice. I am not trying to post copyrighted
>> >>>material. I am intending to post evidence of criminal wrongdoing -
>> >>>and remain alive after I have done so. There are challenges to this.
>> >>
>> >>Posting such a thing to Usenet does not seem like a very direct or effective way
>> >>to communicate with law enforcement.
>> >
>> >
>> >I agree. Why not contact the media? Your local news station might be
>> >interested if it will bring them up in the ratings.
>>
>> It smells a little fishy to me.
>
>Your nasal instict is wrong.
>
>> If evidence of criminal behavior, the only reason I can think of to post
>> it to Usenet would be if the alleged criminal were on Usenet and the
>> poster wants him to see it and become nervous.
>
>Maybe you need to think a bit more.
>
>> Otherwise, one would print it out, put it in an envelope and send it to law
>> enforcement or the media as you suggested.
>
>I do not share your faith in "the media."
>
>Not everything that one can make a file of can be printed out.
>
>Even as the pitfalls of trying to post the files on USENET have
>been pointed out to me, I already know that there are pitfalls to
>putting physical objects in an envelope and mailing that off.
>Fingerprints on the envelope and its contents must be avoided.
>Leaving a trail of having bought the materials used has to be
>avoided. One must avoid leaving a trail of recognition when getting
>the postage and posting the envelope. There are issues here.
>
>> No, there is more to it than we are being told.
>
>Duh! Of course there's more to it than you're being told. I am just
>trying to find a way to get evidence into the right hands
>anonymously. You don't need to know everything.
I am sure you know best......
|
|