On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:12:00 GMT, Moi <moi@here.now> wrote:
>On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 20:05:36 +0000, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
>
>
>>>I was expecting sarcasm.
>>
>> No, it was facetious but not sarcastic. I simply do not see any point in
>> continuing the discussion. You hate the Tories which means we cannot
>> have a rational, in-depth debate.
>>
>>
>> "The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with
>> the average voter." -Winston Churchill
>
>Does facetious mean 'shitty'?
>
>Everybody is wrong but you. Even when discussing something you clearly
>know nothing about.
BTW, your reply is true to the stereotypical attitude of the French and most
socialists. If others disagree, you immediately attribute such disagreement to
their ignorance.
I do love the predictable nature of your "contributions".
>
>"No rational argument will have a rational effect on a man who does not
>want to adopt a rational attitude". - Karl Popper
--
"Never argue with a fool; onlookers may not be able to tell the difference."
-Mark Twain
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 |
|