Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Ian Field" <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.e-book.technical
References: <UNCYv.638611$ZX5.95131@fx32.am4><6c063ap75dsegvuuh7mido4183hp8ip5lq@4ax.com><3sXYv.399841$J62.116903@fx03.am4><3jh83adohak4u2kjfnnnii0lakprd38jjr@4ax.com> <HgdZv.310843$8M5.26382@fx09.fr7> <25fZv.506553$O%1.423429@fx31.am4> <u64b3ahiqs4uink7qj0c1unpg55mavup08@4ax.com> <SvgZv.416039$NQ4.154961@fx26.am4> <neab3ad2g1tacd9ldogpnl9al4vlfbalbj@4ax.com> <xWyZv.679569$7b1.342157@fx01.am4> <ipfd3a971q9coa4gmsbd9c960kfouvmu0p@4ax.com> <_vAZv.533120$Jh7.52420@fx27.am4> <r0nd3at3eh598luur11rvk9qk3hqnanabp@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <r0nd3at3eh598luur11rvk9qk3hqnanabp@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Tories resent the poor.
Lines: 2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
Message-ID: <6mBZv.411473$dz3.257652@fx20.am4>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.3.12.46
X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com
X-Trace: 1412882946 82.3.12.46 (Thu, 09 Oct 2014 19:29:06 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 19:29:06 UTC
Organization: virginmedia.com
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:29:17 +0100
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2866117375
X-Received-Bytes: 6465
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.e-book.technical:463
"Charles Lindbergh" <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in message
news:r0nd3at3eh598luur11rvk9qk3hqnanabp@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 19:31:32 +0100, "Ian Field"
> <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Charles Lindbergh" <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in message
>>news:ipfd3a971q9coa4gmsbd9c960kfouvmu0p@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:43:18 +0100, "Ian Field"
>>> <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Charles Lindbergh" <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>news:neab3ad2g1tacd9ldogpnl9al4vlfbalbj@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:46:01 +0100, "Ian Field"
>>>>> <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Charles Lindbergh" <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:u64b3ahiqs4uink7qj0c1unpg55mavup08@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:09:09 +0100, "Ian Field"
>>>>>>> <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Moi" <moi@here.now> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:HgdZv.310843$8M5.26382@fx09.fr7...
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:05:29 +0000, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I can appreciate your frustration, but do you really believe your
>>>>>>>>>> government could run things any better? Right now, you are not
>>>>>>>>>> subsidizing these industries with your taxes. If they were still
>>>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>> government control, don't you think they would operate at a loss
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> require taxpayer subsidy? If you never took the train, wouldn't
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> resent having to subsidize those who do use them?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Honestly, I can't think of anything that any government runs
>>>>>>>>>> better
>>>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>> private industry, can you?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The British Government still subsidizes the privatized rail
>>>>>>>>> service.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Its also going to heavily subsidise the French company EDF to build
>>>>>>>>a
>>>>>>>>nuclear power station in the UK.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>So basically - they're giving back the money they got for asset
>>>>>>>>stripping!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "giving" back the money in exchange for a nuclear power plant is
>>>>>>> known
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> "buying".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You're obviously a bit pedestrian at this!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The power station (assuming the French fuckwits ever complete it) will
>>>>>>remain property of EDF - the huge government subsidies are just a
>>>>>>bribe
>>>>>>to
>>>>>>build it here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>When the Toraidhe sold the National Grid to the French, we all got a
>>>>>>cheque
>>>>>>paid,
>>>>>>over
>>>>>>sexed and over here) were instructed that if they slept with a local
>>>>>>woman,
>>>>>>they should leave half a crown (50p in todays money) under the pillow
>>>>>>before
>>>>>>sneaking out, so she couldn't call it rape.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>There were no such payments for any of the other assets stripped by
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>Toraidhe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Apparently the generators are to be manufactured by the Chinese -
>>>>>>anything
>>>>>>to avoid creating UK jobs!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If my approach is pedestrian, yours could be described as baseless
>>>>> hysteria.
>>>>>
>>>>> You continuously accuse people of crimes: steal, bribe, etc. However,
>>>>> upon
>>>>> examination, no one has been charged, prosecuted or convicted of wrong
>>>>> doing in
>>>>> these transactions, at least not as far as I can determine.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will say to you what I say to my fellow countrymen, if you don't
>>>>> like
>>>>> how
>>>>> things are being done, then run for office yourself. Vote the people
>>>>> you
>>>>> dislike out of office, do something more productive than bloviate on
>>>>> Usenet.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for creating jobs in the UK, I suspect if a UK company had stepped
>>>>> up
>>>>> to the
>>>>> plate with a competent, competitive bid they would have gotten the
>>>>> job.
>>>>
>>>>Not with the Toraidhe in charge they wouldn't!
>>>>
>>>>The toraidhe constantly whinge about the cost of the NHS - then cut back
>>>>on
>>>>staff recruitment till they're forced to hire in expensive foriegn
>>>>agency
>>>>staff.
>>>>
>>>>The previous infestation of Toraidhe pretty much stamped out our
>>>>manufacturing industry (allegedly to hit the unions) - now there's
>>>>little
>>>>more than shelf stacking and burger flipping.
>>>
>>> OK, I am positive you are absolutely correct about everything you are
>>> asserting.
>>> Thanks for sharing.
>>
>>I suppose I also imagined the Thieving Toraidhe awarding a railway rolling
>>stock contract to Siemens when they knew a UK manufacturer was counting on
>>getting that contract.
>
> What part of "I am positive you are absolutely correct about everything
> you are
> asserting" was unclear?
I was expecting sarcasm.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 |
|