On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:43:18 +0100, "Ian Field" <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
>
>
>"Charles Lindbergh" <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in message
>news:neab3ad2g1tacd9ldogpnl9al4vlfbalbj@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:46:01 +0100, "Ian Field"
>> <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Charles Lindbergh" <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in message
>>>news:u64b3ahiqs4uink7qj0c1unpg55mavup08@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:09:09 +0100, "Ian Field"
>>>> <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Moi" <moi@here.now> wrote in message
>>>>>news:HgdZv.310843$8M5.26382@fx09.fr7...
>>>>>> On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:05:29 +0000, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can appreciate your frustration, but do you really believe your
>>>>>>> government could run things any better? Right now, you are not
>>>>>>> subsidizing these industries with your taxes. If they were still
>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>> government control, don't you think they would operate at a loss and
>>>>>>> require taxpayer subsidy? If you never took the train, wouldn't you
>>>>>>> resent having to subsidize those who do use them?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Honestly, I can't think of anything that any government runs better
>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>> private industry, can you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The British Government still subsidizes the privatized rail service.
>>>>>
>>>>>Its also going to heavily subsidise the French company EDF to build a
>>>>>nuclear power station in the UK.
>>>>>
>>>>>So basically - they're giving back the money they got for asset
>>>>>stripping!!!
>>>>
>>>> "giving" back the money in exchange for a nuclear power plant is known
>>>> as
>>>> "buying".
>>>
>>>You're obviously a bit pedestrian at this!
>>>
>>>The power station (assuming the French fuckwits ever complete it) will
>>>remain property of EDF - the huge government subsidies are just a bribe to
>>>build it here.
>>>
>>>When the Toraidhe sold the National Grid to the French, we all got a
>>>cheque
>>>over
>>>sexed and over here) were instructed that if they slept with a local
>>>woman,
>>>they should leave half a crown (50p in todays money) under the pillow
>>>before
>>>sneaking out, so she couldn't call it rape.
>>>
>>>There were no such payments for any of the other assets stripped by the
>>>Toraidhe.
>>>
>>>Apparently the generators are to be manufactured by the Chinese - anything
>>>to avoid creating UK jobs!!!
>>
>>
>> If my approach is pedestrian, yours could be described as baseless
>> hysteria.
>>
>> You continuously accuse people of crimes: steal, bribe, etc. However,
>> upon
>> examination, no one has been charged, prosecuted or convicted of wrong
>> doing in
>> these transactions, at least not as far as I can determine.
>>
>> I will say to you what I say to my fellow countrymen, if you don't like
>> how
>> things are being done, then run for office yourself. Vote the people you
>> dislike out of office, do something more productive than bloviate on
>> Usenet.
>>
>> As for creating jobs in the UK, I suspect if a UK company had stepped up
>> to the
>> plate with a competent, competitive bid they would have gotten the job.
>
>Not with the Toraidhe in charge they wouldn't!
>
>The toraidhe constantly whinge about the cost of the NHS - then cut back on
>staff recruitment till they're forced to hire in expensive foriegn agency
>staff.
>
>The previous infestation of Toraidhe pretty much stamped out our
>manufacturing industry (allegedly to hit the unions) - now there's little
>more than shelf stacking and burger flipping.
OK, I am positive you are absolutely correct about everything you are asserting.
Thanks for sharing.
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 |
|