"Charles Lindbergh" <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in message
news:894b3ah0ttnes5h5bqgp9g6h553lee4vib@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:12:59 +0100, "Ian Field"
> <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Charles Lindbergh" <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in message
>>news:hbpa3aplaas1nt7e2l8lh58r8jht5ilg78@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:04:55 GMT, Moi <moi@here.now> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:05:29 +0000, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I can appreciate your frustration, but do you really believe your
>>>>> government could run things any better? Right now, you are not
>>>>> subsidizing these industries with your taxes. If they were still
>>>>> under
>>>>> government control, don't you think they would operate at a loss and
>>>>> require taxpayer subsidy? If you never took the train, wouldn't you
>>>>> resent having to subsidize those who do use them?
>>>>>
>>>>> Honestly, I can't think of anything that any government runs better
>>>>> than
>>>>> private industry, can you?
>>>>
>>>>The British Government still subsidizes the privatized rail service.
>>>>
>>>>In 2013 the rail companies received UKP 4 billion, and paid out 200
>>>>million UK pounds to shareholders.
>>>>
>>>>Part of the UK rail system (Northern rail) is part-owned by the a
>>>>subsidiary of the Dutch state-owned company Abellio. It's been announced
>>>>today that theycompany has won the contract to run Scots Rail from next
>>>>April.
>>>
>>> And yet, with all this government involvement the rail system still runs
>>> like
>>> crap.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>The mail service is an example of a government running a better industry
>>>>that a private company. As are the armed forces, police service & a
>>>>national health service.
>>>
>>> In the USA, FedEx and UPS operate far more efficiently then our US
>>> postal
>>> service which is on the verge of insolvency. We have an outstanding
>>> armed
>>> forces, which is the governments main responsibility. Unfortunately,
>>> our
>>> armed
>>> forces are a source of tremendous waste and financial inefficiency. I am
>>> just
>>> not sure how one can truly privatize the military of a nation state.
>>
>>Hiring mercenaries (euphemistically called "contractors") - seems to be
>>well
>>underway.
>
> Let me know when the United States Navy hires mercenaries to operate our
> fleet
> ballistic missile submarines or our Nimitz or Gerald R. Ford class
> aircraft
> carriers.
Dunno about mercenaries, but civilian "contractors" aren't exactly rare.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 |
|