alt.binaries.e-book.technicalPrev. Next
Re: Tories resent the poor. virginmedia.com
Ian Field (gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com) 2014/10/08 12:12

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Ian Field" <gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.e-book.technical
References: <9n303atdpk648spgoa7r69a9nmkkdd7q7p@4ax.com> <hWcYv.274664$eZ4.163642@fx02.fr7> <56733adel7cii0race2gqfgp9786in34k5@4ax.com> <nEhYv.434971$Zu6.271616@fx06.am4> <s8a33ah9ta5b2fqqf0bmfjar7fb4foj03c@4ax.com> <dyzYv.453471$KL.183@fx19.am4> <h2j53ahfgo3809imgec2mped2shruscj2e@4ax.com> <UNCYv.638611$ZX5.95131@fx32.am4> <6c063ap75dsegvuuh7mido4183hp8ip5lq@4ax.com> <3sXYv.399841$J62.116903@fx03.am4> <3jh83adohak4u2kjfnnnii0lakprd38jjr@4ax.com> <HgdZv.310843$8M5.26382@fx09.fr7> <hbpa3aplaas1nt7e2l8lh58r8jht5ilg78@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <hbpa3aplaas1nt7e2l8lh58r8jht5ilg78@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Tories resent the poor.
Lines: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 format=flowed;
 charset="iso-8859-1";
 reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
Message-ID: <E8fZv.457385$KL.13953@fx19.am4>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.3.12.46
X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com
X-Trace: 1412791972 82.3.12.46 (Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:12:52 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:12:52 UTC
Organization: virginmedia.com
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:12:59 +0100
X-Received-Body-CRC: 79402649
X-Received-Bytes: 3450
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.e-book.technical:445



"Charles Lindbergh" <spirit@stlouis.invalid> wrote in message
news:hbpa3aplaas1nt7e2l8lh58r8jht5ilg78@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:04:55 GMT, Moi <moi@here.now> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:05:29 +0000, Charles Lindbergh wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I can appreciate your frustration, but do you really believe your
>>> government could run things any better? Right now, you are not
>>> subsidizing these industries with your taxes.  If they were still under
>>> government control, don't you think they would operate at a loss and
>>> require taxpayer subsidy?  If you never took the train, wouldn't you
>>> resent having to subsidize those who do use them?
>>>
>>> Honestly, I can't think of anything that any government runs better than
>>> private industry, can you?
>>
>>The British Government still subsidizes the privatized rail service.
>>
>>In 2013 the rail companies received UKP 4 billion, and paid out 200
>>million UK pounds to shareholders.
>>
>>Part of the UK rail system (Northern rail) is part-owned by the a
>>subsidiary of the Dutch state-owned company Abellio. It's been announced
>>today that theycompany has won the contract to run Scots Rail from next
>>April.
>
> And yet, with all this government involvement the rail system still runs
> like
> crap.
>
>>
>>The mail service is an example of a government running a better industry
>>that a private company. As are the armed forces, police service & a
>>national health service.
>
> In the USA, FedEx and UPS operate far more efficiently then our US postal
> service which is on the verge of insolvency. We have an outstanding armed
> forces, which is the governments main responsibility.  Unfortunately, our
> armed
> forces are a source of tremendous waste and financial inefficiency. I am
> just
> not sure how one can truly privatize the military of a nation state.

Hiring mercenaries (euphemistically called "contractors") - seems to be well
underway.


Follow-ups:1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859
6061626364656667686970717273747576777879
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite